Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WALLACE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WALLACE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. in 5541 NORTH BOWLAND PLACE, DUBLIN, OH 43016 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339160335.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wallace Construction Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wallace Construction Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5541 NORTH BOWLAND PLACE
City
DUBLIN
State
OH
ZIP
43016
Mailing
1825 JOE WALKER ROAD, GALENA, OH 43021
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(a)(1): Unless otherwise provided in this section, aerial lifts acquired for use on or after January 22, 1973 shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the applicable requirements of the American National Standards for "Vehicle Mounted Elevating and Rotating Work Platforms," ANSI A92.2-1969, including appendix. Aerial lifts acquired before January 22, 1973 which do not meet the requirements of ANSI A92.2-1969, may not be used after January 1, 1976, unless they shall have been modified so as to conform with the applicable design and construction requirements of ANSI A92.2-1969.   a. On the north side of the building where employees were working from the basket of an aerial lift, the basket guardrail supports were damaged and 2 out of the four were broken, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $980
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $980 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt shall be worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift. Note to paragraph (b)(2)(v): As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).  a. On the north side of the building where employees were working from the basket of an aerial lift reattaching the exterior weatherproof wrap, employee's harnesses were not connected to the anchor points of the basket, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $980
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On the roof of the four story building where employees were working on the vent holes, employees were not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $700
  • — Z (S) $2000

View Wallace Construction Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339160335.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.