OSHA Inspection: GLACKIN LLC

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(1): The spraybooth was not substantially constructed of steel, securely and rigidly supported, or of concrete or masonry except that aluminum or other substantial noncombustible material may be used for intermittent or low volume spraying.    a.  On or about July 3, 2013, there was a large hole in the ceiling of the spray booth.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10): 29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10):  Illumination panels did not effectively isolate the spraying area from the area in which the lighting unit is located:  a.  On or about July 3, 2013, the fluorescent lights in the ceiling of the spray booth were not effectively enclosed from the interior of the spray booth.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a.  On or about July 3, 2013, employees were required to wear respirators and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluation, fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about July 3, 2013, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved 3M half-face and N95 dust mask respirators had not been provided medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a. On or about July 3, 2013, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved half-face and N95 dust mask respirators had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about July 3, 2013, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved half-face and N95 dust mask respirators had not received respirator training.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a.  On or about July 3, 2013, employees operated the powered industrial truck throughout the workplace and were not provided the required training and evaluation.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $900 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a.  On or about July 3, 2013, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program which described how the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to styrene, acetone, and quartz.

Issued

Aug 20, 2013

Abate by

Sep 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. On or about July 3, 2013, the employer did not provide information and training to employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to styrene, acetone, and quartz.