Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: HESSE INDUSTRIAL SALES INC. DBA TEXAS MANUFACTURING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HESSE INDUSTRIAL SALES INC. DBA TEXAS MANUFACTURING in 5915 MILWEE ST, HOUSTON, TX 77092 (NAICS 332996). OSHA activity number 339163388.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hesse Industrial Sales INC. DBA Texas Manufacturing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hesse Industrial Sales INC. DBA Texas Manufacturing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5915 MILWEE ST
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77092
Mailing
5915 MILWEE ST, HOUSTON, TX 77092
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332996
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.       The employer does not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection  when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles and molten metal. This violation occurred on or about  July 2, 2013  in the shop area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when employees were using a bench grinder to grind metal parts without  appropriate eye and face protection.            Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees  grinding metal parts are protected from flying particles by wearing  appropriate eye and face protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2013
Abate by
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    The employer does not ensure that  one or more methods  of machine guarding  was provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards created by rotating parts. This violation occurred on or about  June 25, 2013  in the shop  area where an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards when operating the Oster threading machine which did not have guards on the rotating chucks.          Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees using the threader are protected from the rotating chucks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2013
Abate by
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating .   The employer does not ensure that oxygen cylinders in storage were separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating. This violation was observed on or about July 2, 2013 at the west side of the shop where employees were exposed to fire hazards when working in the area where oxygen cylinders were stored near acetylene cylinders.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that oxygen and acetylene are stored at least 20 feet apart or separated by a noncombustible barrier.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339163388.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.