WESTPORT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: J & F ROOFING SERVICES, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of J & F ROOFING SERVICES, LLC in 10 HARDING LANE, WESTPORT, CT 06880 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339166472.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J & F ROOFING SERVICES, LLC
- Site address
- 10 HARDING LANE
- City
- WESTPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06880
- Mailing
- 85 STEVEN ST. APT. 1, STAMFORD, CT 06902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employee who was working from the scaffold platforms that was attached to the forks of the all-terrain forklift at a height above 10 feet above the ground was not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employee who was working from the scaffold platform at more than 10 feet above the ground without fall protection was not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employees who were working on the 12 in 12 pitch roof with an eave height of approximately 21 feet above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 21 feet above the ground while working on the 12 in 12 pitch roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder�s length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigied support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist emmployees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. Worksite: The extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof at a height of approximately 21 feet above the ground did not have its side rails extended 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339166472.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.