WHITE SETTLEMENT, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: QUANTUM MECHANICAL SERVICES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of QUANTUM MECHANICAL SERVICES in 8500 ROCKWAY, WHITE SETTLEMENT, TX 76108 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 339168726.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- QUANTUM MECHANICAL SERVICES
- Site address
- 8500 ROCKWAY
- City
- WHITE SETTLEMENT
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76108
- Mailing
- 5001 RONDO DR., FORT WORTH, TX 76106
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238220
- Employees
- 65
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: On or about July 5, 2013, employees installing an HVAC units worked on the roof without fall protection exposing the employees to falls of more than 6 feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. On or about July 5, 2013, employees were using an aluminum extension ladder with side rails that did not extend at least 3 feet above the edge of the roof. The employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2100
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed. On or about July 5, 2013, employees were using an aluminum "A" Frame ladder that was leaning up against the wall to gain access to another section of the roof. The ladder was not resting on all four legs exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238220)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339168726.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.