Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: KGP LOGISTICS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KGP LOGISTICS LLC in 500A SUMNER WAY, NEW CENTURY, KS 66031 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 339170870.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch KGP Logistics LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for KGP Logistics LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KGP LOGISTICS LLC
Site address
500A SUMNER WAY
City
NEW CENTURY
State
KS
ZIP
66031
Mailing
500A SUMNER WAY, NEW CENTURY, KS 66031
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484121
Employees
24
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Sep 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):  The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):   A personal protective equipment assessment was not performed for each job position to determine the types of personal protective equipment needed for employee(s) changing propane tanks on powered industrial trucks, employee(s) lifting heavy materials, fall protection for order fillers using powered industrial trucks to access products in the upper storage racks, and etc., thus exposing all employee(s) to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1785
  • · Z (S) $2550

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Sep 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  At the establishment a written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented to inform all employees of hazardous chemical products such as  propane.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 2, 2013
Abate by
Aug 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined at least daily before being placed in service.  At the facility employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that the following powered industrial trucks operating in the warehouse were not examined prior to being placed in service:   (a)  Crown unit #46  (b)  Crown unit #33  (c)  Crown unit #22  (d)  Crown unit #16  (e)  Crown unit #51
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339170870.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.