Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO REYNOSA TORRES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANTONIO REYNOSA TORRES in 108 NORMANDY COURT, MADISON, MS 39110 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339172694.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio Reynosa Torres for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio Reynosa Torres is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
108 NORMANDY COURT
City
MADISON
State
MS
ZIP
39110
Mailing
2619 DAHLGREN, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78237
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $601 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns.     (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 three employees were exposed to a struck by hazard when working under scaffold platforms without being protected from falling objects by wearing protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $601
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:Note:  This requirement does not apply to float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 inch x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent was used in lieu of toeboards.    (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 three employees were exposed to a struck by hazard when working under scaffold platforms that did not provide protection from falling objects. The scaffold did not have toeboard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.405 J01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $601 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, or receptacles had live parts normally exposed to employee contact.     (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 an employee was exposed to hazard of electric shock when working with a brick saw connected to an uncovered receptacle.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $601
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $802 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)       (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 two employees were exposed to a fall hazard when working from scaffold platforms that were not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $802
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide.   (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 an employee was exposed to a fall hazard when working from scaffold platform that was not at least 18 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $601 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights shall bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.     (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 four employees were exposed to a fall hazard when working from scaffold platforms that were not bearing on base plates.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $601
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Aug 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $601 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.      (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 four employees were exposed to a fall hazard when no ladder was provided for access to scaffold platforms.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $601
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2013
Abate by
Jul 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,402 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.     (a) South Facade of Residence - On or about July 9, 2013 three employees were exposed to a fall hazard up to 17 feet when working from scaffold platforms. Employees were not protected from falling to a lower level by a guardrail system or personal fall arrest system or safety net system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1402
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339172694.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.