Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION in 152 HAMPDEN STREET, BOSTON, MA 02119 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339184137.

Watch Daly Construction Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daly Construction Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
152 HAMPDEN STREET
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02119
Mailing
37 LIBBY ROAD, MILTON, MA 02186
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Jobsite:  An employee working on the ground did not wear a hard hat.  He was exposed to a struck-by hazard from falling materials and objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): In addition to wearing hardhats each employee on a scaffold were not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, or guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects. When the falling objects are too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected by any of the above-listed measures, the employer shall place such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall and shall secure those materials as necessary to prevent their falling.  Jobsite:  The employee on the scaffold did not wear a hard hat.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:Note:  This requirement does not apply to float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 inch x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent was used in lieu of toeboards.  Jobsite:  George Street side of building  Neither a toeboard or a barricade was provided to protect the ground worker from falling objects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling.  Note:  See exceptions in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section.  Jobsite:  The pump jack work platform was approximately 28 inces from the front of the building.  There was no guardrail along the front of the work platform and the employee was not 'tied off'.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(ii): Guys, ties, and/or braces were not installed  according to the scaffold manufacturer's recommendations or at the closest horizontal member to the 4:1 height and repeated vertically at locations of horizontal members every 20 feet (56.1 m) or less thereafter for scaffolds 3 feet ((0.91 m) wide or less, and every 26 feet (7.9 m) or less therafter for scaffolds greater than 3 feet (0.91m) wide.  Jobsite:  pump jack scaffold at south side of building  The pump jack scaffold was only braced near its top: the braces were located at a height of more than 36 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.  Jobsite:  Pump jack scaffolding along south side of building.  An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 29 feet while working unprotected on the pump jack scaffolding.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  Jobsite:  pump jack scaffold along George Street side of building.  Employees were not competent to inspect the pump jack scaffold.  The scaffold had several deficiencies.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Jobsite:  George Street side of building  Employees using a pump jack scaffold were not adequately trained in scaffold hazards and scaffold safety.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339184137.