RICE LAKE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: RICE LAKE WEIGHING SYSTEMS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RICE LAKE WEIGHING SYSTEMS in 230 W. COLEMAN STREET, RICE LAKE, WI 54868 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339193823.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICE LAKE WEIGHING SYSTEMS
- Site address
- 230 W. COLEMAN STREET
- City
- RICE LAKE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54868
- Mailing
- 230 W. COLEMAN STREET, RICE LAKE, WI 54868
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 499
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1025 D01 III
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(1)(iii): Full shift personal samples were not representative of the monitored employee's regular, daily exposure to lead: (a)Throughout the facility; the employer only provided full shift personal sampling for 40% of the cast operators regular daily production volume of exposure to lead.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $2000
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: (a) Throughout the facility; the employer only sampled 40% of cast operation production exposure to lead using lead shot. The employer did not conduct any sampling for the cast operator exposure to lead working with the lead hot pot.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 D07
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(7): Additional exposure monitoring was not conducted when there was a change in production, process, control or personnel, or any other reason to suspect a change that may have resulted in new or additional exposure to lead: (a) Throughout the facility; the employer did not conduct sampling for lead exposure in response to the cast operation relocation from one area of engineering controls to an area with different engineering controls.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 11, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: (a) Throughout the facility; The employer is not maintaining a housekeeping schedule or methods that supports the work environment to be maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339193823.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.