Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GEORGE APAP INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GEORGE APAP INC. in 20 AND 23 WILMONT AVENUE, WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 339220261.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch George Apap INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for George Apap INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GEORGE APAP INC.
Site address
20 AND 23 WILMONT AVENUE
City
WHITE PLAINS
State
NY
ZIP
10605
Mailing
1278 ROUTE 311, PATTERSON, NY 12563
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,900 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    a) 20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees were manually scraping lead-based paint and the employer did not provide training on the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.62 OSHA Lead in Construction Regulation; on or about 6/24/13.    b) 20 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:  An employee was sweeping and vacuuming lead-based paint debris and the employer did not provide training on the hazards of lead and the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.62 OSHA Lead in Construction Regulation; on or about 7/5/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1900
  • · Z (S) $2975

1926.62 D02 V F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i) regarding 29 CFR 1926.59, Hazard Communication:   a) 20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   An employee was manually scraping lead-based paint and the employer did not provide training on as required by the standard; on or about 6/24/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):    a) 20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees were manually scraping lead-based paint and the employer did not determine if employees were exposed to lead at or above the action level; on or about 6/24/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1900
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.134 C01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i): The written program did not contain procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace:   a) 20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees used half-face air purifying respirators while performing manual scraping of lead-based paint and the company's written respirator program did not contain specific procedures for selecting respirators; on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(ii): The written program did not contain provisions for medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators:   a) 20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees used half-face air purifying respirators while performing manual scraping of lead-based paint and provisions for medical evaluations were not contained in the company's written respirator program; on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(iii): The written program did not contain fit test procedures for tight-fitting respirators:  a) 20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees used half-face air purifying respirators while performing manual scraping of lead-based paint and the company's written respiratory protection program did not contain site-specific procedures for implementing requirements for fit testing of respirators; on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 M02 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(i)(B): The employer did not establish a record of the qualitative and quantitative fit tests administered to an employee which included the type of fit test performed:  a) 20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees used half-face air purifying respirators while performing manual scraping of lead-based paint and the record of fit tests administered to employees did not include the type of test performed; on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 M02 I C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(i)(C): The employer did not establish a record of the qualitative and quantitative fit tests administered to an employee which included the specific make, model, style and size of respirator tested:  a)  20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees used half-face air purifying respirators while performing manual scraping of lead-based paint and the record of fit tests administered to employees did not include the specific make, model, style and size of respirator tested; on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 M02 I E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2013
Abate by
Jan 25, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(i)(E): The employer did not establish a record which included the pass/fail results for qualitative fit tests:   a)  20 and 23 Wilmont Avenue, White Plains, NY:   Employees used half-face air purifying respirators while performing manual scraping of lead-based paint and the record of fit tests administered to employees did not include the pass/fail results for qualitative fit tests; on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339220261.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.