LUMBERTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RATLIFF INDUSTRIES INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RATLIFF INDUSTRIES INC. in 9514 RATLIFF STREET, LUMBERTON, TX 77657 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339221236.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RATLIFF INDUSTRIES INC.
- Site address
- 9514 RATLIFF STREET
- City
- LUMBERTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77657
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 8359, LUMBERTON, TX 77657
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards of being struck-by loads suspended by underhung hoists that had not been inspected which are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: This violation was observed on or about July 22, 2013, in the fabrication shop where employees were exposed to struck-by loads of steel being loaded, unloaded and relocated throughout the shop by the following underhung hoists that had not been inspected periodically and frequently by the employer a) Shawbox, 3 ton hoist b) Budgit, 1 ton hoist c) Shawbox, 3 ton hoist Pursuant to 29 C.F.R., 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including documentation to ensure that hoists are inspected frequently and periodically.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour. The employer does not ensure that oxygen cylinders were separated from acetylene cylinders with at least a 5 foot barrier with a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour or a minimum distance of 20 feet. This violation was observed on or about July 22, 2013, outside of the fabrication shop area, where employees were exposed to fire hazards where oxygen cylinders were stored with acetylene cylinders without a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet high with a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour or a minimum distance of 20 feet. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of this citation, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that oxygen cylinders in storage are separated from fuel-gas cylinders by a minimum distance of 20 feet or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least 1/2 hour.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. The employer does not ensure that a written hazard communication program that describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. This violation occurred on or about July 22, 2013, and at times prior thereto, in the fabrication shop where employees were exposed to fire and chemical hazards when using compressed gases and chemicals such as, but not limited to, oxygen, acetylene, cutting fluids, and hydraulic oil without developing a hazard communication program. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19 within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that a written hazard communication program is developed, implemented, and maintained that includes the criteria specified in 29 C.F.R. 1910.1200 (f), (g), and (h).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Ratliff Industries INC.
View Ratliff Industries INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339221236.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.