EVERETT, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: GARDEN FRESH SALAD CO., INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GARDEN FRESH SALAD CO., INC. in 304 SECOND STREET, EVERETT, MA 02149 (NAICS 424480). OSHA activity number 339222341.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GARDEN FRESH SALAD CO., INC.
- Site address
- 304 SECOND STREET
- City
- EVERETT
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02149
- Mailing
- 17-20 NEW ENGLAND PRODUCE CENTER, CHELSEA, MA 02150
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424480
- Employees
- 45
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Location - Establishment On or about 7/22/13, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear a tight fitting half face elastomeric respirator while spray painting.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1470
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: (a) Location - Maintenance Department On or about 7/22/13, employees that were allowed to voluntarily use disposable dust masks while sweeping floors were not provided the information in Appendix D of 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Location - Maintenance Department On or about 7/22/13, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees required to use tight fitting elastomeric half face respirators while spray painting.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) Location - Maintenance Department On or about 7/22/13, the employer did not provide fit testing for employees required to use tight fitting elastomeric half face respirators while spray painting.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 H01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer: (a) Location - Maintenance Department On or about 7/22/13, the employer did not ensure the tight fitting elastomeric half face respirators provided to employees for use were cleaned.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) Location - Chemical Room On or about 7/22/13, the employer did not provide an eye wash / drench shower for employees that change out containers and repair pumps containing corrosive chemicals including, but not limited to, Univar OX76685 (Sodium Hypochlorite, Sodium Hydroxide), Univar OX622680 (Sodium Hypochlorite, Sodium Hydroxide), Alpha Chemical Terminate (Quaternary Ammonium compound), Alpha Chemical Alpha Bac 10 (Quaternary Ammonium compound), Alpha Chemical Lac-300 (Potassium Hydroxide, Sodium Hypochlorite), and Alpha Chemical LD-300 (Potassium Hydroxide, Sodium Hydroxide, Amine Oxide).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3430
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) Location - Chemical Room On or about 7/22/13, the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees that work with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Univar OX76685 (Sodium Hypochlorite, Sodium Hydroxide), Univar OX622680 (Sodium Hypochlorite, Sodium Hydroxide), Alpha Chemical Terminate (Quaternary Ammonium compound), Alpha Chemical Alpha Bac 10 (Quaternary Ammonium compound), Alpha Chemical Lac-300 (Potassium Hydroxide, Sodium Hypochlorite), and Alpha Chemical LD-300 (Potassium Hydroxide, Sodium Hydroxide, Amine Oxide).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: (a) Location - Chemical Room On or about 7/22/13, a pail containing approximately one gallon of an unknown chemical was unlabeled.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Sep 30, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Location - Chemical Room On or about 7/22/13, the employer did not provide effective information and training for employees that work with hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to, Univar OX76685 (Sodium Hypochlorite, Sodium Hydroxide), Univar OX622680 (Sodium Hypochlorite, Sodium Hydroxide), Alpha Chemical Terminate (Quaternary Ammonium compound), Alpha Chemical Alpha Bac 10 (Quaternary Ammonium compound), Alpha Chemical Lac-300 (Potassium Hydroxide, Sodium Hypochlorite), and Alpha Chemical LD-300 (Potassium Hydroxide, Sodium Hydroxide, Amine Oxide).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424480)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339222341.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.