Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR MASONRY UNLIMITED, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUPERIOR MASONRY UNLIMITED, INC. in 310 MADISON STREET, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339229650.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Superior Masonry Unlimited, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Superior Masonry Unlimited, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
310 MADISON STREET
City
TALLAHASSEE
State
FL
ZIP
32399
Mailing
152 HILLCREST DRIVE, FORT MILL, SC 29715
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a. On or about July 25, 2013, an employee using a Makita 500F circular saw did not have on safety glasses, exposing himself to being hit by flying debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:  a. On or about July 25, 2013, the two level tubular welded scaffold system had multiple areas of the scaffold that were not fully planked, exposing employees to a fall hazards of approximately 13 feet 7 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects:  a. On or about July 25, 2013, on a two buck tubular welded scaffold system, employees were not protected from an overhead hazard, in that there were no toeboards installed to protect employees fom falling debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units:  a. On or about July 25, 2013, a two level tubular welded scaffold system was erected on an unstable object, in that the screw jack was nailed to a mudsill that was then placed on bricks, exposing employees to a collapse hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  a. On or about July 25, 2013, employees used the end frames and crossbraces of the two level tubular scaffold system as a means of access/egress, exposing themselves to a fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:  a. On or about July 25, 2013, employees performing siding and masonry operations from a two level tubular scaffold system were not protected from a fall hazard, in that there was no guardrail system on several areas of the scaffold system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Sep 5, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:  a. On or about July 25, 2013, employees working on the tubular welded scaffold system were exposed to a fall hazard of approximatley 13 feet 7 inches because guardrails were not installed on all open sides nor on the ends of the platforms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Superior Masonry Unlimited, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339229650.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.