BILLERICA, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: PARALLEL PRODUCTS OF NEW ENGLAND INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PARALLEL PRODUCTS OF NEW ENGLAND INC in 26 COOK STREET, BILLERICA, MA 01821 (NAICS 562920). OSHA activity number 339237125.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PARALLEL PRODUCTS OF NEW ENGLAND INC
- Site address
- 26 COOK STREET
- City
- BILLERICA
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01821
- Mailing
- 26 COOK STREET, BILLERICA, MA 01821
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562920
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: (a) Location - Production area: On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed assess a potential overexposure of noise when employees were working around machines that were above the PEL.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $500
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) Location - Production area: On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Location - Production area: On or about 7/29/13, employer did not perform medical evaluations for employees exposures to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy: (a) Location - Production area: On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to develop, document and utilize control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were performing maintenance on a HRB Badger Baler machine.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3000
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.178 L04 II B
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): Refresher training in relevant topics was not provided to the operator when the operator had been involved in an accident or near-miss incident (a) Location - Production area: On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to ensure an employee satisfied refresher training and evaluations regarding powered industrial trucks when an employee was involved in an accident or near-miss incident.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.184 E01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach: (a) Location - Maintenance shop area: On or about 7/29/13, Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards and chain failure when the employer failed to ensure alloy steel chains were annually inspected.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Location - Production area: On or about 7/29/13, employees were exposed to amputations when the employer failed to adequately guard a wire tie on a HRB Badger Baler machine.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3000
- · Z (S) $6300
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet: (a) Location - Maintenance shop area: On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to separate oxygen cylinders from fuel-gas cylinders a minimum distance of 20 feet or by a noncomombustible barrier at least 5 feet high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) Location - Production area; On or about 7/29/13, Employer did not ensure that employees using a respirator were properly fit tested.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $900
More inspections at Parallel Products of NEW England INC
View Parallel Products of NEW England INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562920)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339237125.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.