Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PARALLEL PRODUCTS OF NEW ENGLAND INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PARALLEL PRODUCTS OF NEW ENGLAND INC in 26 COOK STREET, BILLERICA, MA 01821 (NAICS 562920). OSHA activity number 339237125.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Parallel Products of NEW England INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Parallel Products of NEW England INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
26 COOK STREET
City
BILLERICA
State
MA
ZIP
01821
Mailing
26 COOK STREET, BILLERICA, MA 01821
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562920
Employees
50
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:    (a) Location - Production area:  On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed assess a potential overexposure of noise when employees were working around machines that were above the PEL.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $500
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a) Location - Production area:  On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to establish and implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Location - Production area: On or about 7/29/13, employer did not perform medical evaluations for employees exposures to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:    (a) Location - Production area:  On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to develop, document and utilize control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were performing maintenance on a HRB Badger Baler machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.178 L04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): Refresher training in relevant topics was not provided to the operator when the operator had been involved in an accident or near-miss incident    (a) Location - Production area:  On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to ensure an employee satisfied refresher training and evaluations regarding powered industrial trucks when an employee was involved in an accident or near-miss incident.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:    (a) Location - Maintenance shop area:  On or about 7/29/13, Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards and chain failure when the employer failed to ensure alloy steel chains were annually inspected.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) Location - Production area:  On or about 7/29/13, employees were exposed to amputations when the employer failed to adequately guard a wire tie on a HRB Badger Baler machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $6300

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet:    (a) Location - Maintenance shop area:  On or about 7/29/13, the employer failed to separate oxygen cylinders from fuel-gas cylinders a minimum distance of 20 feet or by a noncomombustible barrier at least 5 feet high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.134 F02

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Location - Production area; On or about 7/29/13, Employer did not ensure that employees using a respirator were properly fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $900

View Parallel Products of NEW England INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339237125.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.