Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: METAL TECH PARTNERS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of METAL TECH PARTNERS in 525 PIGGOTT ST., BRUNING, NE 68322 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339239196.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Metal Tech Partners — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Metal Tech Partners is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
METAL TECH PARTNERS
Site address
525 PIGGOTT ST.
City
BRUNING
State
NE
ZIP
68322
Mailing
2105 R STREET PO BOX 368, GENEVA, NE 68361
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
98
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): An exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source:    525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Office):  The employer did not ensure that the EXIT signs located in the office were illuminated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):           525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Building #2, Building #4): The employer did not ensure that adequate machine guarding was provided on equipment including, but not limited to,       1)      Amada 50-ton Press Brake #4 at the point of operation.  2)      Amada 100-ton Press Brake #5 at the point of operation.  3)      Amada HFB 17 Press Brake #6 at the point of operation.  4)      Amada Shear at the point of operation.      Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):  Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:                                                                                                                                   525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Maintenance Area): The opening between the work rest and abrasive wheel exceeded one-eighth inch on the 8 Jet bench grinder.  The opening was five-eighth inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):  The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:                                                                                                          525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Maintenance Area): A tongue guard on the Dayton 8 bench grinder was not being used to ensure that it was adjusted to a 1/4 inch opening. The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top opening was 1 1/2 inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2):  Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:      525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Building #4): An electrical box, which was intended for use while permanently fixed to a wall and which had pre-punched knockouts, was attached to the end of a flexible cord and was used next to the Amada HFB 17 Press Brake.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.305 G01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv): Flexible cords and cables were used for purposes prohibited by subparagraph (D) of this paragraph where the employer did not ensure that flexible cord was not attached to a building surface:      525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Building #4): A drop box flexible cord was attached to a flexible conduit on the Amada HFB 17 Press Brake.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.304 B03 II C 3

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(b)(3)(ii)(C)(3): A cord set and plug was not visually inspected before each days use for external defects, such as deformed or missing pins, and such equipment was defective and used:      525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Maintenance Area): A cord set and plug was not visually inspected before each day's use for external defects, such as deformed or missing pins, and such equipment was defective and used. A flexible cord that was in use on the 8 Jet bench grinder had a missing ground pin.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:      525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Building #2): An unused opening was not closed for an electrical outlet box used to power an oscillating fan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2975

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Abate by
Nov 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:   525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Site-Wide): The employer did not ensure that the OSHA Form 300 for the calendar year of 2013 were completed as required by the regulation to include, but not limited to:    a)      Specific part(s) of body affected. b)      Object/substance that directly injured or made person ill.    Abatement certification is required for this violation.  Abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2013
Abate by
Nov 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii):  The periodic inspection certification of energy control procedures did not contain the required documentation on identification of the machine or equipment  inspection date, employees included, and the person performing the inspection:    525 Piggott St., Bruning, NE 68222 (Site-Wide):  There was no documentation provided by the employer that showed the person performing the periodic inspection and the employees included in the inspection, but not limited to, the Amada Shear.        Abatement certification is required for this violation.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Metal Tech Partners's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339239196.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.