Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO REYES PLASTERING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ANTONIO REYES PLASTERING in 1174 ADA LANE, EL PASO, TX 79932 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 339242034.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Antonio Reyes Plastering — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Antonio Reyes Plastering is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1174 ADA LANE
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79932
Mailing
3606 DOUGLAS AVE., EL PASO, TX 79903
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:      On or about July 31, 2013, one employee working below the scaffold in the rear southeast corner of the building was working without any form of head protection. This condition exposed the employee to potential head injury from impact, or from falling objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)    On or about July 31, 2013, one employee was working on the scaffold not fully planked, in the rear southeast corner of the building. This condition exposed the employee to a fall hazard of greater than 10-feet to the ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units:  On or about July 31, 2013, one employee was working on a homemade scaffold on top of the rear porch corner of the building. This condition exposed the employee to a fall hazard to the level below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Sep 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems:    On or about July 31, 2013, on the scaffold in the rear southeast corner of the building, one employee was working without any form of fall protection. This condition exposed the employee to a fall hazard greater than 10-feet to ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:     On or about July 31, 2013, one employee working on the porch roof in the rear of the building without any form of fall protection. This condition exposed the employee to a fall hazard greater than 6-feet to ground level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339242034.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.