Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: GENERAL BODY MANUFACTURING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GENERAL BODY MANUFACTURING in 6901 AVENUE V, HOUSTON, TX 77011 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339250193.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch General Body Manufacturing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for General Body Manufacturing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6901 AVENUE V
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77011
Mailing
6901 AVENUE V, HOUSTON, TX 77011
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
67
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,499 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:    a)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 months on a Proserve 5 tons located in Bldg. A.    b)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 months on an Abell-Howe 2 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 1.    c)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 months on a Proserve 5 tons located in Bldg. A, Hoist-Shawbox G36045RB.    d)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 months on a Landel 30 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 1.    e)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 months on a Mid-America  15 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 2.    f)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 months on a Mid-Armerica 15 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 2, Hoist-Dresser Load Lifter    g)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection ov overhead cranes  had not been conducted during the past 12 months on a Seco 10 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 3.    h)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection had not been conducted during the past 12 months for overhead cranes on a Landell 10 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 3.    i)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 months on a Seco 10 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 4.    j)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a periodic inspection of overhead cranes had not been conducted during the past 12 monthson a Demag 10 tons located in Bldg. B, Bay 4.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2499
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.179 B05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Jan 7, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5): The rated load of crane(s) was not plainly marked on each side of the crane:  a) At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, In Bldg. B, Bay 1, a 2 ton crane manuactured by Abell-Howe did not have it's rated load plainly marked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Dec 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,499 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):      a) A Makita 10-inch mitre saw, Model LS 1040, was being used without a guard that prevents the operator from having their body in the danger zone.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2499
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Dec 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    a)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, a flexible cord was used as fixed wiring to connect a chop saw in Bldg B.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 17, 2013
Abate by
Dec 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.  a)  At the worksite and on August 5, 2013, two flexible cords lacked strain relief, exposing bare conductors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339250193.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.