MANITOWOC, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: EMANUEL S MAINTENANCE SERVICE LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EMANUEL S MAINTENANCE SERVICE LLC in 1618 S.16TH ST., MANITOWOC, WI 54220 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339261042.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EMANUEL S MAINTENANCE SERVICE LLC
- Site address
- 1618 S.16TH ST.
- City
- MANITOWOC
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54220
- Mailing
- 3251 14TH AVE S., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On 8/6/13, employees working with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing or provided with safety glasses.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On 8/6/13, employees were reroofing a two story steep pitch house while using incomplete and improper personal fall protection in that: a) Three workers were using positioning devices for fall arrest. b) Three roof anchors had more than one lifeline connected to them. c) Three lifelines were tied to the roof anchors and not connected with snap hooks. d) Two employees had their lifelines hooked to their chest straps. e) One lifeline was wrapped around the chimney and hooked back onto itself. f) One employee tearing off shingles on the garage roof had no fall protection of any kind.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Oct 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): On and before 8/6/13, the employees had not been trained by a competent person to properly install or use personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339261042.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.