PHELPS, NY —
OSHA Inspection: TRIPLETT MACHINE CO.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TRIPLETT MACHINE CO. in 1374 PHELPS JUNCTION ROAD, PHELPS, NY 14532 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339261166.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRIPLETT MACHINE CO.
- Site address
- 1374 PHELPS JUNCTION ROAD
- City
- PHELPS
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14532
- Mailing
- 1374 PHELPS JUNCTION ROAD, PHELPS, NY 14532
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 58
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,785
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: a) Triplett Machine Co., on or about 8/7/13: The Employer allows voluntary use of N95 filtering facepieces and 3M half-mask respirators and has not supplied employees with Appendix D of the respirator standard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) Triplett Machine Co., on or about 8/7/13: Employer had not established nor implemented a written respiratory protection program when employees are voluntarily wearing respirators for protection when pressure testing and blasting parts.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee voluntarily wore the respirator in the workplace: a) Triplett Machine Co., on or about 8/7/13: Employees who voluntarily wear 3M half-mask air purifying respirators have not been provided with a medical evaluation, exposing employees to cardiopulmonary stress hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G02
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,785
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter: a) Triplett Machine, Inc., on or about 8/7/13: The Employer did not provide annual training to employees on the use and application of portable fire extinguishers. *ABATEMENT NOTE: By this date the employer must either correct the alleged violation or implement a Fire Safety Policy; as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and .39(a) which includes the evacuation requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(b).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $2,380
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) New Building, on or about 8/7/13: (2) Two Sunex single spindle drill presses were not provided with guards to cover the serrated chucks and tooling. b) TC6 Area, on or about 8/7/13: Hardinge lathe was not provided with a chuck guard. c) TC6 Area, on or about 8/7/13: Lagun Milling machine was not provided with guards to cover the chuck and tooling. d) Shaft Department, on or about 8/7/13: (3) Bridgeport milling machines were not provided with chuck and tool guards. e) Shaft Department, on or about 8/7/13: Buffalo dual spindle drill press was not provided with a guard to cover the serrated chuck and tooling. f) TC6 Area, on or about 8/7/13: Hardinge speed lathes were not provided with guards over the collets and collet closer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Shaft Department, on or about 8/7/13: Bridgeport milling machine #238, had the in-running nip points of the belt and pulley unguarded. b) Shaft Department, on or about 8/7/13: Buffalo drill press had the in-running nip points of the belt and pulley unguarded.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs 42 inches or less from the floor level were not fully enclosed by guards conforming to requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Shaft Department, on or about 8/7/13: Bridgeport milling machine #238, had the in-running nip points of the belt and pulley unguarded. b) Shaft Department, on or about 8/7/13: Buffalo drill press had the in-running nip points of the belt and pulley unguarded.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Triplett Machine CO.
View Triplett Machine CO.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339261166.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.