HAMMON, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: HAMMON ELEVATOR
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HAMMON ELEVATOR in 509 MAIN STREET, HAMMON, OK 73650 (NAICS 493130). OSHA activity number 339266256.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HAMMON ELEVATOR
- Site address
- 509 MAIN STREET
- City
- HAMMON
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73650
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 606, HAMMON, OK 73650
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A05
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and/or trap door floor opening, while the cover was not in place, was not constantly attended by someone or was not protected on all exposing sides by removable standard railings: On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, the boot pit floor opening in the control room was not guarded on exposed sides nor covered when not in use, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $816
- · Z (S) $1360
1910.272 D
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(d): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency action plan meeting the requirements contained in 1910.38(a). On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer had not developed and implemented an emergency action plan which specified elements to include an employee alarm system, development of evacuation procedure and training employees in those actions they are to take during an emergency, exposing employees to fire hazards, explosion hazards, and/or other emergencies.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $816
- · Z (S) $1360
1910.272 G01 I
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(i): The employer shall issue a permit for entering bins, silos, or tanks unless the employer or the employer's representative (who would otherwise authorize the permit) is present during the entire operation. The permit shall certify that the precautions contained in this paragraph (1910.272(g)) have been implemented prior to employees entering bins, silos or tanks. The permit shall be kept on file until completion of the entry operations. On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer nor employer representative, who would otherwise authorize, did not ensure a permit certifying precautions was issued prior to employees entering bins, exposing employees to oxygen-deficient atmosphere and/or explosion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.272 E01
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 19, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(e)(1): The employer did not provide training to employees at least annually and when changes in job assignments would expose them to new hazards in the grain handling facilities. On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure the following: a) Employees had not been trained when required to enter bins to perform clean-up activities, exposing employees to oxygen-deficient atmosphere and/or explosion. b) Employees required to use fall protection had not been trained when personal protective equipment (PPE) was necessary, how to properly wear PPE or the proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the PPE, exposing employees to fall hazards. OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE (for fall protection): 29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.272 E01 I
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(e)(1)(i): Current employees and new employees, prior to starting work in the grain handling facility, were not trained in the general safety precautions, including recognition and preventive measures for the hazards related to dust accumulations and common ignition sources. On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, employees were not provided with non-sparking tools to move grain or for cleanup activities in the boot pit, exposing employees to fire hazards and/or explosion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $816
- · Z (S) $1360
1910.272 J01
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(j)(1): The employer did not develop and implement a written housekeeping program that established the frequency and the method(s) determined best to reduce accumulations of fugitive grain dust on ledges, floors, equipment, and other exposed surfaces. On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer had not developed and implemented a written housekeeping program to specify the frequency and method(s) to be used to best reduce dust accumulations, exposing employees to fire hazards and/or explosion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.272 M01 I
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(m)(1)(i): Regularly scheduled inspections of at least the mechanical and safety control equipment associated with dryers, grain stream processing equipment, dust collection equipment including filter collectors, and bucket elevators. On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure the bucket elevator had been inspected, exposing employees to fire hazards and/or explosion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $816
- · Z (S) $1360
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not maintained in a fully charged and operable condition. On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, in the following locations, portable fire extinguishers were not fully charged, exposing employees to fire hazards. a) control room of the grain elevator b) shop at the main facility
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Jan 27, 2014
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly. On or about August 7, 2013, and times prior thereto, at the following locations, the employer did not ensure a visual monthly inspection was completed for portable fire extinguishers, exposing employees to fire hazards. a) control room of grain elevator b) shop at main facility
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493130)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339266256.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.