Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: D.F. PRAY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of D.F. PRAY, INC. in 338-350 ALLENS AVE., PROVIDENCE, RI 02903 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339268682.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D.F. Pray, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D.F. Pray, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
D.F. PRAY, INC.
Site address
338-350 ALLENS AVE.
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02903
Mailing
25 ANTHONY STREET, SEEKONK, MA 02771
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 E06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(6): Competent Persons. The employer did not ensure that all asbestos work performed within regulated areas is supervised by a competent person, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section:    Worksite: When the employer conducted Class II asbestos work, it was not supervised by a competent person as defined in 29 CFR 1926.1101(b).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2100

1926.1101 G08 II F

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(F): Upon being lowered, unwrapped material was not transferred to a closed receptacle in such manner so as to preclude the dispersion of dust:  Worksite: When the employer directed the removal of Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) using a crane and clamshell bucket, the material was not transferred to a closed receptacle in order to preclude the dispersion of dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1101 G08 VI

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2013
Abate by
Feb 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(vi): Instead of the work practices and controls listed in paragraph (g)(8)(i) through (v) of this section, when the employer used different or modified engineering and work practice controls the following provisions were not complied with:  (A): The employer did not demonstrate by data representing employee exposure during the use of such method(s) under conditions which closely resemble the conditions under which the method is to be used, that employee exposure would not exceed the PELs or Excursion Levels under any anticipated circumstances; (B): A Competent Person did not evaluate the work area, the projected work practices and the engineering controls, and did not certify in writing, that the different or modified controls were adequate to reduce direct and indirect employee exposure to below the PELs under all expected conditions of use and that the method meets the requirements of this standard:  Worksite: When the employer assigned a contractor to remove Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) from a roof an exposure assessment, or equivalent data representing employee exposure, was not conducted immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to determine expected exposures to asbestos.  In addition, a Competent Person did not evaluate the work area, projected work practices, and engioneering control used, and did not certify in writing that these different or modified controls were adequate to reduce direct and indirect employee exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

View D.F. Pray, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339268682.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.