Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANCISCO CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of FRANCISCO CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 1408 RAPIDS CT., ROCKWALL, TX 75087 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339271249.

Watch Francisco Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Francisco Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1408 RAPIDS CT.
City
ROCKWALL
State
TX
ZIP
75087
Mailing
310 E. TRIPP RD., SUNNYVALE, TX 75182
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $260 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi), each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4):    The employer does not ensure that each employee on a scaffold is protected from falling to lower levels.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, Texas 75087; where at least one (1) employee, who was working from a job-made supported scaffold while securing rafters to the ridge beam, was not protected from falling more than 10-feet to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $260
  • — Z (S) $3080

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $12,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): When the employer did not demonstrate that it was infeasible or created a greater hazard to use these systems and another provision in 29 CFR 1926.501(b) did not provide for an alternative fall protection measure, each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:     The employer does not protect each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6-feet or more above lower levels from falling to the lower levels.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, Texas 75087; where at least two (2) employees, who were walking and working from on top of ceiling joists and top plates erecting rafters, were not protect from falling to the lower levels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $12000
  • — Z (W) $15400

1926.100 A

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $13,200 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    The employer does not ensure that employees are protected from head injuries due to impact, or falling or flying objects, by wearing hard hats.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, Texas 75087; where at least seven (7) employees, who were exposed to head injuries from impact, or from falling of flying objects, were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2000
  • — Z (R) $13200

1926.102 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $11,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    The employer does not ensure that employees, who use power-operated hand tools, are protected from eye injuries.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, Texas 75087; where employees, who were operating hand-held circular saws, reciprocating saws, and pneumatic nailers, were not protected from eye injuries by wearing safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2000
  • — Z (R) $11000

1926.451 B02

Repeat Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii), each scaffold platform and walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:    The employer does not ensure that scaffold platforms are at least 18-inches wide.  This violation was occurred on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, TX 75087; where employees worked from scaffold platforms that were 5 1/2-inches wide, and were exposed to the hazard of falling to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2000
  • — Z (R) $15400

1926.452 A04

Repeat Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(a)(4): Diagonal bracing in both directions was not installed across the entire outside face of all double- and single-pole scaffolds:  The employer does not ensure that diagonal bracing is installed across the entire outside face of all single pole scaffolds.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, Texas 75087; where employees worked from single-pole wood scaffolds that did not have diagonal bracing in both directions installed across the entire outside face, and were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

1926.451 C02

Repeat Gravity 5 6 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,280 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:    The employer does not ensure that supported scaffold poles bear on base plates and mud sills.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, Texas 75087; where the poles to at least three (3) single-pole wood scaffolds, erected by the employer, did not bear on base plates and mud sills, and exposed employees to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2000
  • — Z (R) $5280

1926.451 E01

Repeat Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used:    The employer does not ensure that employees are provided with a safe means of access to scaffold platforms that are more than 2-feet above a point of access.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Rockwall, Texas 75087; where employees climbed the scaffold poles and stud walls to access the work platforms, and they were exposed to the hazard of falling to the lower levels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2000
  • — Z (R) $15400

1926.1051 A

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2014
Abate by
Feb 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): A stairway or ladder was not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment or personnel hoist was provided:  The employer does not ensure that a stairway or ladder is provided at all personnel points of access where there is a break in elevation of 19 inches or more.  This violation was observed on or about August 8, 2013, at a workplace located at 1408 Rapids Ct., Dallas, Texas 75087; where at least two (2) employees climbed the stud walls to ascend to and descend from elevated work areas, and were exposed to the hazard of falling to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339271249.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.