PALATINE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: ARLINGTON PLATING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARLINGTON PLATING COMPANY in 600 S. VERMONT ST, PALATINE, IL 60078 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 339294969.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARLINGTON PLATING COMPANY
- Site address
- 600 S. VERMONT ST
- City
- PALATINE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60078
- Mailing
- 600 S. VERMONT ST, PALATINE, IL 60078
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- Employees
- 110
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
32 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.24 B
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.24(b): Fixed stairs were not provided where access to elevations was daily or at each shift, for such purposes as gauging, inspection, regular maintenance, etc., and where such work may expose employee(s) to acids, caustics, gases, or other harmful substances, or for which purposes the carrying of tools or equipment by hand is normally required: a) The employer failed to supply employees with fixed stairs for access to tanks where the employees accessed the tanks daily or at each shift for gauging or inspection, where carrying tools or equipment by hand was normally required, or when such work may exposed employee(s) to acids, caustics, or other harmful substances. This occurred in the areas to access the Sludge Thickener Tank. b) The employer failed to supply employees with fixed stairs for access to tanks where the employees accessed the tanks daily or at each shift for gauging or inspection, where carrying tools or equipment by hand was normally required, or when such work may exposed employee(s) to acids, caustics, or other harmful substances. This occurred in the areas to access the Soak Cleaning Tank. c) The employer failed to supply employees with fixed stairs for access to tanks where the employees accessed the tanks daily or at each shift for gauging or inspection, where carrying tools or equipment by hand was normally required, or when such work may exposed employee(s) to acids, caustics, or other harmful substances. This occurred in the areas to access the Nickel Chrome Treatment Tank. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3960
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.26 C03 III
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $3,960
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(3)(iii): Ladders were used on surfaces which did not provide a secure footing: a) The employer failed to ensure ladders were used on a surface that allowed for both feet to be securely planted to the floor, such as the ladders used to access the Sludge Thickener Tank. b) The employer failed to ensure ladders were used on a surface that allowed for both feet to be securely planted to the floor, such as the ladders used to access the Nickel Chrome Treatment Tank. c) The employer failed to ensure ladders were used on a surface that allowed for both feet to be securely planted to the floor, such as the ladders used to access the Hand Line #1 Steam Valve in the Boiler Room. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3960
- — C (S) $3960
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.36 B01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $6,930
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(b)(1): At least two exit routes were not available in the workplace to permit prompt evacuation of employees and other building occupants during an emergency, except as allowed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. The exit routes must be located as far away as practical from each other so that if one exit route is blocked by fire or smoke, employees can evacuate using the second exit route. a) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to provide at least two emergency exits to allow for prompt exit during an emergency in all areas of the facility, such as the Tube Buffing Room. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $6930
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $6,930
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B)-(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline (B) specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy; (C) specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them; and (D) specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures. a) The established procedures for the application of energy control did not specify the steps for an orderly shutdown, isolation, blocking or securing machines or equipment on the Tube Buffing Table; did not specify the specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices and the responsibility for them when working on equipment on the Tube Buffing Table; and did not specify how to test and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices on the Tube Buffing Table. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6930
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.147 C04 II C
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them. a) Facility Wide- The established procedures for the application of energy control did not specify the specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices and the responsibility for them when working on equipment such as the Rectifiers, Dust Collector, Boiler, Tube Buffing Table, Filter Press, Pool Filters, Nickel Recovery, Aluminum Recovery, Degreasers, and Sand Filters. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 II D
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control. a) Facility Wide- The established procedures for the application of energy control did not specify how test the machines or equipment, such as the Rectifiers, Dust Collector, Boiler, Tube Buffing Table, Filter Press, Pool Filters, Nickel Recovery, Aluminum Recovery, Degreasers, and Sand Filters, to verify the effectiveness of the lockout devices. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $6,930
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): Employees did not receive training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls were acquired. a) The employer did not provide authorized lockout/tagout training to all Tube Buffing Room employees. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6930
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.147 C07 I B
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure: a) Facility Wide- The employer did not provide the lockout training to employees whose duties classify them as affected level individuals. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: a) Boiler Room- The employer failed to ensure that persons who performed maintenance or servicing on the Boiler affixed energy isolating devices to each energy source. b) Waste Water Treatment- The employer failed to ensure that persons who performed maintenance or servicing on the Filter Press, affixed energy isolating devices to each energy source. c) Waste Water Treatment- The employer failed to ensure that persons who performed maintenance or servicing on the Sand Filters, affixed energy isolating devices to each energy source. d) Polishing Department- The employer failed to ensure that persons who performed maintenance or servicing on the Degreasers, affixed energy isolating devices to each energy source. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) Maintenance Shop- The employer failed to ensure that all areas where hazards were created by the point of operation on equipment, such as the unguarded Dayton Table Saw that was used to cut plastic and PVC, were provided with guarding to protect the operators from injury. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.219 C03
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,970 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(3): Vertical or inclined shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform was not enclosed with stationary casing(s): a) The employer failed to ensure that all areas where rotating shafts were exposed at seven feet or less from the working level, such as the unguarded rotating shafts on motors for four of the tanks in the Waste Water Treatment Area, that they were provided with guarding and encased to protect the employees working around the area from injury. b) The employer failed to ensure that all areas where rotating shafts were exposed at seven feet or less from the working level, such as the unguarded rotating shafts on motors for the tank next to the Sludge Thickener Tank, that they were provided with guarding and encased to protect the employees working around the area from injury. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2970
- — Z (S) $2970
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven (7) feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt, and where both runs of a horizontal belt are 42 inches or less from the floor, the belt shall be fully enclosed in accordance with paragraphs (m) and (o) of this section: a) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that all horizontal belts within seven or less feet from the ground or working platform, such as the belts on the Tube Buffing Table, Buffing Machine #1, Buffing Machine #2 and Buffing Machine #3, were provided with a guard on all exposed sides. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that all vertical and inclined belts within seven or less feet from the ground or working platform, such as the belts on the Tube Buffing Table, Buffing Machine #1, Buffing Machine #2 and Buffing Machine #3, were provided with a guard on all exposed sides. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven (7) feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed: a) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that a chain and sprocket within seven or less feet from the ground or working platform on the Tube Buffing Table was provided with a guard on all exposed sides to enclose the hazard posed by the moving equipment. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3960
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,950 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a) Hand Line Area- The employer failed to ensure that electrical equipment, such as the twist lock with flexible wiring coming out of hard wired conduit, was being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. b) Hand Line Area- The employer failed to ensure that electrical equipment, such as the 2-outlet gang box with a plug that was being used to supply additional outlets, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4950
- — Z (S) $4950
1910.303 B06
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,950 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(6): Equipment located in damp or wet locations and/or exposed to a vapors, liquids and corrosive agents, were not identified for that purpose. a) Jessup Line- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes, and fittings in environments where they were exposed to liquids, vapors and/or a corrosive atmosphere, were identified for use in that type of operating environment. Boxes, fittings and enclosures such as on outlet boxes that were mounted to columns and the conduit leading to them on the Jessup Line showed outward signs of corrosion and exposure to moisture. b) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes, and fittings in environments where they were exposed to liquids, vapors and/or a corrosive atmosphere, were identified for use in that type of operating environment. Boxes, fittings and enclosures such as on the three outlet boxes that were mounted above the Caustic Lime Slurry Tank in the Waste Water Treatment showed outward signs of corrosion and exposure to moisture. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4950
- — Z (S) $4950
1910.305 E01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(e)(1): Cabinets, cutout boxes, fittings, boxes, and panelboard enclosures in damp or wet locations were not installed to prevent moisture or water from entering and accumulating within the enclosures. The enclosures were not weatherproof in wet locations: a) Electroless Nickel (EN) Line- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes and fittings in damp or wet locations on the EN Line were installed to prevent moisture and water from entering and used weatherproof electrical components. In this area there were hazards posed by the electrical outlet boxes on Tank #522B and on an adjacent wet tank used in the plating process where the front cover for the outlets was missing and there was an unused opening on the side of the outlet that was on Tank #522B. b) Jessup Line- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes and fittings in damp or wet locations such as the boxes that were mounted to columns in the middle of the work platform on the Jessup Line as well as on a column above a tank, were installed to prevent moisture and water from entering and used weatherproof electrical components. In this area there were signs of corrosion as well as liquids being used in the process on a daily basis. c) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed to ensure all boxes and fittings in damp or wet locations, such as the boxes above the Caustic Lime Slurry Tank in the Waste Water Treatment Area, were installed to prevent moisture and water from entering and used weatherproof electrical components. In this area there was evidence of splashing from the tank and corrosion. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.334 A04
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(4): Portable electric equipment and flexible cords that was used in highly conductive work locations (such as those inundated with water or other conductive locations) or in job locations where employees were likely to contact water or conductive liquids were not approved for those locations: a) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed ensure that portable electric equipment and flexible cords, such as the Tripp Lite relocatable power tap on the Chrome Destruct Tank that was supplying power to the LMI Pump for the Sodium Bisulfide and Caustic Lime Tanks, pumps that were submerged in liquid filled tanks, and extension cords running to the, that were used in highly conductive work locations in the Waste Water Treatment Area were approved for use in those wet locations. These cords and powertaps could be inundated with liquids or in job locations where employees were likely to contact water or conductive liquids. b) Hand Line- The employer failed ensure that portable electric equipment and flexible cords, such as the relocatable power taps, pumps that were submerged in liquid filled tanks and were used in highly conductive work locations on the Hand Line were approved for use in those wet locations. These cords and powertaps could be inundated with liquids or in job locations where employees were likely to contact water or conductive liquids. c) Jessup Line- The employer failed ensure that portable electric equipment and flexible cords, such as the relocatable power taps that were used to supply power to pumps that were submerged in liquid filled tanks and were used in highly conductive work locations on the north and northwest side of the Jessup Line, were approved for use in those wet locations. These cords and powertaps could be inundated with liquids or in job locations where employees were likely to contact water or conductive liquids. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $6,930
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): a) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that live parts such as the inside the live control cabinet for the Tube Buffing Table, was guarded against accidental contact by use of a closed cabinet or other forms of approved enclosures. This cabinet in the Tube Buffing Room was found open and being accessed at least three times per shift by an employee to start the Tube Buffing Table. b) Polishing Room- The employer failed to ensure that live parts, such as the light switch in the Polishing Room, was guarded against accidental contact by use of a closed cabinet or other forms of approved enclosures. c) Hand Line Area- The employer failed to ensure that live parts, such as the breaker box in the Hand Line Area, were guarded against accidental contact by use of a closed cabinet or other forms of approved enclosures. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6930
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: a) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that employees working in areas where there was the potential for electrical hazards inside the control cabinet for the Tube Buffing Table were provided with and used electrical personal protective equipment that was specific to the parts of the body to be protected and the work being performed. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.303 G02 II
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $3,960
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(ii): In locations where electric equipment was likely to be exposed to physical damage, enclosures or guards were not so arranged and of such strength as to prevent such damage: a) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed to ensure that electrical wiring was protected by enclosures or guards in areas where it was likely to be exposed to damage such as in the Waste Water Treatment Area where wiring that was supplying power to a motor, was in conduit that had become disconnected, subjecting the wiring to possible damage. b) Hand Line- The employer failed to ensure that electrical wiring was protected by enclosures or guards in areas where it was likely to be exposed to damage such as in the Hand Line Area where wiring that was supplying power to a timer was in conduit running to the feeder box for the Bright Nickel Tank 643 that had become disconnected, subjecting the wiring to possible damage. c) Polishing Department- The employer failed to ensure that electrical wiring was protected by enclosures or guards in areas where it was likely to be exposed to damage such as in the Polishing Department where the conduit near the fan on the column and running to a box near Polishing Machine #13 had become disconnected, subjecting the wiring to possible damage. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3960
- — C (S) $3960
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.305 A01 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(1)(i): Metal raceways, cable armor, and other metal enclosures for conductors were not connected to all boxes, fittings, and cabinets to provide effective electrical continuity: a) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed to ensure that metal conduit, such as the conduit supplying power to a motor in the Waste Water Treatment Area that had separated, was connected to provide effective electrical continuity. b) Hand Line Area- The employer failed to ensure that metal enclosures, such as the conduit supplying power to a tank, conduit supplying power to a timer, and the conduit running to the feeder box for the Bright Nickel Tank 643 in the Hand Line Area, were connected to provide effective electrical continuity. c) Polishing Department- The employer failed to ensure that metal enclosures, such as the conduit that was separated in the Polishing Department near the fan on the column and running to a box near Polishing Machine #13, were connected to provide effective electrical continuity. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3960
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.305 G01 III
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iii): Flexible cords used as permitted in paragraphs (g)(1)(ii)(C), (g)(1)(ii)(G), or (g)(1)(ii)(I) of 29 CFR 1910.305 were not equipped with an attachment plug and energized from an approved receptacle outlet: a) Hand Line- The employer failed to ensure that flexible cord energized directly from a disconnect box on the Hand Line was equipped with an attachment plug and wired directly from an approved receptacle outlet. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5940
- — Z (S) $5940
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: a) Jessup Line- The employer failed to provide permanent wiring on the Jessup Line to supply power to pumps, rectifiers, and motors. Extension cords and flexible wiring were used as a substitute for permanent wiring in this area. b) Hand Line- The employer failed to provide permanent wiring on the Hand Line to supply power to a motor. An extension cord was used as a substitute for permanent wiring in this area. c) Electroless Nickel (EN) Line- The employer failed to provide permanent wiring on the EN Line to supply power to a motor. An extension cords was used as a substitute for permanent wiring in this area. d) Sump Pump Area- The employer failed to provide permanent wiring for the sump pump. Flexible wiring was used as a substitute for permanent wiring in this area. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5940
- — Z (S) $5940
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,960 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a) Maintenance Shop- The employer failed to ensure that flexible cords and cables, such both ends of the power cord for the Roll-In Vertical Bandsaw, were provided with strain relief to prevent pull from being transferred to joints and terminal screws. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3960
- — Z (S) $3960
1910.334 A02 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $5,940
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinches or crushed outer jacket): a) The employer failed to ensure that flexible cord powering pump that was laid across the aisle between the east side of the Jessup Line and the Old Hoist Line was visually inspected before use for external defects such as crushed and missing insulation. b) The employer failed to ensure that flexible cord powering the fan by 427-A on the east side of the Jessup Line was visually inspected before use for external defects such as crushed and missing insulation. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5940
- — C (S) $5940
- — Z (S) $5940
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $11,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): Floor(s) of workroom(s) were not maintained in a clean and, so far as possible, a dry condition: a) Jessup Line- The employer did not ensure all floor areas, such as the area beside the Jessup Line, were kept in a dry condition. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item. Arlington Plating Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2), which was contained in OSHA Inspections Number 280132, Citation 1, Item 2, and was affirmed as a final order on June 26, 2012, with respect to the workplace at 600 S. Vermont St., in Palatine, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $0
- — C (R) $11880
- — Z (R) $11880
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $13,860 · Current $7,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by the point of operation and rotating parts: a) Maintenance Shop- The employer failed to ensure that all points of operation on machines such as the unused portion of the cutting blade on the Roll-In Vertical Bandsaw, which was used to cut materials other than wood, were fully guarded and enclosed to protect employees during the machines' operation. b) Polishing Department- The employer failed to ensure that all rotating parts on machines such as the spindle end nuts on the Rite Speed & Chas Polishing Machines #1L, 1R, 2L, 2R, 12R, 13L, 13R, 16L, 16R, 17L, 17R, 4L, 7L, 7R, were fully guarded and enclosed to protect employees during the machines' operation. c) Maintenance Shop- The employer failed to ensure that all areas where the hazards were created by the point of operation on equipment, such as the unguarded Dayton Table Saw that was used to cut plastic and PVC, were provided with guarding to protect the operators from injury. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (R) $13860
- — Z (R) $13860
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that all pulleys within seven feet or less feet from the ground or working platform, such as the pulleys on the Tube Buffing Table, Buffing Machine #1, Buffing Machine #2, and Buffing Machine #3, were provided with a guard on all exposed sides. b) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that all horizontal belts connected to pulley systems and within seven or less feet from the ground or working platform, such as the belts on the Tube Buffing Table, Buffing Machine #1, Buffing Machine #2, and Buffing Machine #3, were provided with a guard on all exposed sides. c) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that all vertical and inclined belts connected to pulley systems and within seven feet or less feet from the ground or working platform, such as the belts on the Tube Buffing Table, Buffing Machine #1, Buffing Machine #2, and Buffing Machine #3, were provided with a guard on all exposed sides. d) Tube Buffing Room- The employer failed to ensure that a chain and sprocket connected to pulley systems and within seven or less feet from the ground or working platform on the Tube Buffing Table was provided with a guard on all exposed sides to enclose the hazard posed by the moving equipment. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6930
- — Z (S) $6930
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $7,920 · Current $7,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a) Jessup Line- The employer failed to ensure that electrical equipment, such as the relocatable power taps (power strips), were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. Relocatable power taps were being used on the Jessup Line to power motors and pumps and not being used as intended. b) Production Area- The employer failed to ensure that electrical equipment, such as the relocatable power taps (power strips), were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. Relocatable power taps were being used next to the Sludge Thickener tank to power a motor and not being used as intended. c) Maintenance Department- The employer failed to ensure that electrical equipment, such as the relocatable power taps (power strips), were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. Relocatable power taps were being used in the Maintenance Office to power a small refrigerator and a coffee pot and not being used as intended. d) Jessup Line- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes, and fittings in environments where they were exposed to liquid, vapors, and/or a corrosive atmosphere, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. e) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes, and fittings in environments where they were exposed to liquids, vapors, and/or a corrosive atmosphere, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. f) Electroless Nickel (EN) Line- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes, and fittings in damp or wet locations on the EN Line were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. The electrical outlet boxes on Tank #552B and on an adjacent wet tank used in the plating process were missing the front cover and an unused opening existed on the side of the outlet that was on Tank #552B. g) Jessup Line- The employer failed to ensure all enclosures, boxes, and fittings in damp or wet locations, such as the boxes that were mounted to columns in the middle of the work platform on the Jessup Line as well as on a column above a tank, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. h) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed to ensure all boxes and fittings in damp or wet locations, such as the boxes above the Caustic Lime Slurry Tank in the Waste Water Treatment Area, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. i) Waste Water Treatment Area- The employer failed to ensure that portable electric equipment and flexible cords, such as the Trip Lite relocatable power tap on the Chrome Destruct Tank that was supplying power to the LMI Pump for the sodium Bisulfide and Caustic Lime Tanks, pumps that were submerged in liquid filled tanks, and extension cords that were used in conductive work locations in the Waste Water Treatment Area, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. j) Hand Line- The employer failed to ensure that portable electric equipment and flexible cords, such as the relocatable power taps and pumps that were submerged in liquid filled tanks, and used in conductive work locations on the Hand Line, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. k) Jessup Line- The employer failed to ensure that portable electric equipment and flexible cords, such as the relocatable power taps that were used to supply power to pumps that were submerged in liquid filled tanks and used in conductive work locations on the north and northwest side of the Jessup Line, were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. l) Hand Line- The employer failed to ensure that the flexible cord energized directly from a disconnect box on the Hand Line was being used as permitted under its listing and labeling. m) Jessup Line- The employer failed to ensure that flexible wiring and extension cords being used on the Jessup Line to supply power to pumps, rectifiers, and motor were being used as permitted under their listing and labeling. n) Hand Line- The employer failed to ensure that an extension cord being used to provide power to a motor on the Hand Line was being used as permitted under its listing and labeling. o) Electroless Nickel (EN) Line- The employer failed to ensure that an extension cord that was being used to supply power to a motor on the EN Line was being used as permitted under its listing and labeling. p) Sump Pump Area- The employer failed to ensure that flexible wiring being used to supply power for the sump pump was being used as permitted under its listing and labeling. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $7000
- — C (R) $7920
- — Z (R) $7920
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $12,210
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: a) The employer failed to ensure that all unused openings on boxes were closed on equipment, such as on the gang boxes on the Jessup Line which were exposed to contaminants that could enter the boxes and cause a fire hazard. b) The employer failed to ensure that all unused openings on boxes were closed on equipment, such as in the Tube Buffing Room on the outlet that was on wooden portion of the east wall. c) The employer failed to ensure that all unused openings on boxes were closed on equipment such as on the feeder box for the vertical bandsaw in the Maintenance Department. d) The employer failed to ensure that all unused openings on boxes were closed on equipment, such as in the Hand Line Area on the 440V feeder box near the waste water tank and the 220V feeder box for the Bright Nickel tank, where contaminants could and cause a fire hazard. e) The employer failed to ensure that all unused openings on boxes were closed on equipment, such as on the EN Line where a 220V feeder box had an open knockout that exposed the inside of the box to contaminants that could enter and cause a fire hazard. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item. Arlington Plating Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii), which was contained in OSHA Inspections Number 280132, Citation 2, Item 2, and was affirmed as a final order on June 26, 2012, with respect to the workplace at 600 S. Vermont St., in Palatine, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $12210
- — C (R) $5940
- — Z (R) $5940
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Feb 5, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2015
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $12,210
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: a) The employer failed to ensure that all openings on boxes and fittings were closed on equipment, such as in the Hand Line area above liquid tanks for open boxes and the open breaker box. b) The employer failed to ensure that all openings on boxes and fittings were closed on equipment, such as in the Polishing Department near 9L, on the light switch below the far south window, on the light switch on the column. c) The employer failed to ensure that all openings on boxes and fittings were closed on equipment, such as in the Dock Area to the west side of the west door. d) The employer failed to ensure that all openings on boxes and fittings were closed on equipment, such as in the Tube Buffing Room on the west side of the Tube Buffing Table. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records. Arlington Plating Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii), which was contained in OSHA Inspections Number 280132, Citation 1, Item 7, and was affirmed as a final order on June 26, 2012, with respect to the workplace at 600 S. Vermont St., in Palatine, Illinois.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $12210
- — C (R) $5940
- — Z (R) $5940
More inspections at Arlington Plating Company
View Arlington Plating Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339294969.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.