NEW LEBANON, NY —
OSHA Inspection: RISA MANAGEMENT CORP.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of RISA MANAGEMENT CORP. in 1033 ROUTE 20, NEW LEBANON, NY 12125 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339296287.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RISA MANAGEMENT CORP.
- Site address
- 1033 ROUTE 20
- City
- NEW LEBANON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12125
- Mailing
- 5501 43RD STREET 3RD FLOOR, MASPETH, NY 11378
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures: a). On or about 8/1/13, on site, for employees required to don 3M N95 respirators during grinding operations. The employer mainatined a program that was not implemented. The employer did not provide medical evaluations, fit tests, or training to the employees.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4900
- — W (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a). On or about 8/1/13, on site, for employees required to don 3M N95 respirators during grinding operations. The employer mainatined a program that was not implemented. The employer did not provide medical evaluations.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — W (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter: a). On or about 8/1/13, on site, for employees required to don 3M N95 respirators during grinding operations. The employer maintained a program that was not implemented. The employer did not provide fit tests to the employees.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — W (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 15, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): The employer did not provide training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace: a). On or about 8/1/13, on site, for employees required to don 3M N95 respirators during grinding operations. The employer maintained a program that was not implemented. The employer did not provide training.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — W (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.252 B03
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(3): Employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or brazing operations were not protected by personal protective equipment in accordance with the requirements of 1910.132: a). On or about 8/1/13, on site, for employees conducting hot work tasks such as torching and welding. The employer did not provide employees with protective clothing such as leather gloves, leather jacket or leather apron.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4900
- — W (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.1026 D02 I
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where an employer does representative sampling instead of sampling all employees in order to meet this requirement, the employer shall sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures. (a) On or about 08/01/2013, at establishment, for employees welding on stainless steel. Employer provided OSHA with only personal air monitoring results for hexavalent chromium exposure from a 06/16/2011 monitoring event. Data indicated that exposure to two welders was not obtained due to two pump failures.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4900
- — W (S) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
More inspections at Risa Management Corp.
View Risa Management Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339296287.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.