PEKIN, IL —
OSHA Inspection: TAZEWELL MACHINE WORKS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TAZEWELL MACHINE WORKS, INC. in 2015 S. 2ND ST., PEKIN, IL 61554 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 339297111.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TAZEWELL MACHINE WORKS, INC.
- Site address
- 2015 S. 2ND ST.
- City
- PEKIN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61554
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 895, PEKIN, IL 61554
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331524
- Employees
- 68
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- Dec 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,151 · Current $2,206 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces: An appropriate evaluation of the potential hazards associated with the space was not performed, to determine if the mullers were a permit required confined space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2205.7
- — Z (S) $3151
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Dec 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: a) Employees required to perform maintenance activities in the main muller were exposed to physical hazards because the employer did not post a sign warning that it was a permit required confined space. b) Employees required to perform maintenance activities in the Sinto muller were exposed to physical hazards because the employer did not post a sign warning that it was a permit required confined space. c) Employees required to perform maintenance activities in the Kong muller were exposed to physical hazards because the employer did not post a sign warning that it was a permit required confined space.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Dec 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Employees are exposed to injuries while operating a Yale LP forklift with a tire in poor repair and the forklift had not been taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1764
- — Z (S) $2520
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,410 · Current $3,087 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Employees operating the killark saws are exposed to amputation hazards because the unused portion of the blades are not guarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3087
- — Z (S) $4410
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Dec 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap: Employees are exposed to electrical shock and burns while using a pedestal fan and the employer has not ensured that flexible cords were not used in contiuous lengths.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1764
- — Z (S) $2520
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Dec 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:( Employees are exposed to electrical hazards while using a pedestal fan in the maintenance shop and the employer did not ensure that there was appropriate strain relief at the fan motor and the at the plug end.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Tazewell Machine Works, INC.
View Tazewell Machine Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331524)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339297111.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.