Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TAZEWELL MACHINE WORKS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TAZEWELL MACHINE WORKS, INC. in 2015 S. 2ND ST., PEKIN, IL 61554 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 339297111.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tazewell Machine Works, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tazewell Machine Works, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2015 S. 2ND ST.
City
PEKIN
State
IL
ZIP
61554
Mailing
P.O. BOX 895, PEKIN, IL 61554
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331524
Employees
68
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,151 · Current $2,206 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:    An appropriate evaluation of the potential hazards associated with the space was not performed, to determine if the mullers were a permit required confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2205.7
  • — Z (S) $3151

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:  a)  Employees required to perform maintenance activities in the main muller were exposed to physical hazards because the employer did not post a sign warning that it was a permit required confined space.  b)  Employees required to perform maintenance activities in the Sinto muller were exposed to physical hazards because the employer did not post a sign warning that it was a permit required confined space.    c)  Employees required to perform maintenance activities in the Kong muller were exposed to physical hazards because the employer did not post a sign warning that it was a permit required confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):      Employees are exposed to injuries while operating a Yale LP forklift with a tire in poor repair and the forklift had not been taken out of service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1764
  • — Z (S) $2520

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,410 · Current $3,087 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Employees operating the killark saws are exposed to amputation hazards because the unused portion of the blades are not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3087
  • — Z (S) $4410

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,520 · Current $1,764 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    Employees are exposed to electrical shock and burns while using a pedestal fan and the employer has not ensured that flexible cords were not used in contiuous lengths.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1764
  • — Z (S) $2520

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:(  Employees are exposed to electrical hazards while using a pedestal fan in the maintenance shop and the employer did not ensure that there was appropriate strain relief at the fan motor and the at the plug end.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Tazewell Machine Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339297111.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.