Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ONE FAT FROG, INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ONE FAT FROG, INCORPORATED in 11473 S ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL, ORLANDO, FL 32837 (NAICS 423850). OSHA activity number 339299273.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ONE FAT Frog, Incorporated for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ONE FAT Frog, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11473 S ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL
City
ORLANDO
State
FL
ZIP
32837
Mailing
11473 S ORANGE BLOSSOM TRAIL, ORLANDO, FL 32837
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423850
Employees
23
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.110 F02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2013
Abate by
Sep 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $612 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(i): LP-Gas containers in storage were not located so as to minimize exposure to excessive temperature rise, physical damage, or tampering by unauthorized persons:  (a) north side of building - the propane tanks were stored outside on a storage rack and exposed to being tampered by unathorized persons; observed on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $612
  • · Z (S) $1020

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2013
Abate by
Sep 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite-specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) at the workplace - there was not a written respiratory protection program where employees were required to wear a respirator when painting; observed on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2013
Abate by
Sep 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  (a) at the workplace - the recently purchased fire extinguishers were not mounted; observed on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2013
Abate by
Sep 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:  (a) at the workplace - employees were not provided with training on fire extinguisher use; observed on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 29, 2013
Abate by
Sep 14, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met:  (a) at the workplace - there was not a written hazard communication program where employees used chemicals including, but not limited to, ProForce Heavy Duty Degreaser, ProForce Oven Grill & Fryer Cleaner, and Rust-Oleum paint; observed on or about 8/14/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View ONE FAT Frog, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339299273.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.