Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: BAKER STUCCO, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BAKER STUCCO, INC. in 115 ROSEWOOD DR., METAIRIE, LA 70005 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 339300642.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Baker Stucco, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Baker Stucco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BAKER STUCCO, INC.
Site address
115 ROSEWOOD DR.
City
METAIRIE
State
LA
ZIP
70005
Mailing
664 NEWMAN AVE., JEFFERSON, LA 70121
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):   a) 115 Rosewood Dr., Metairie, LA; On or about 8/13/13, the employer allowed employees to work from  scaffold levels that were not fully planked.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $500
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 20 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:   a) 115 Rosewood Dr., Metairie, LA; On or about 8/13/13, the employer allowed employees to work from a scaffold without base plates installed and no adequate mud sills to provide the required support.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $500
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.   a) 115 Rosewood Dr., Metairie, LA; On or about 8/13/13, the employer allowed employees to use a scaffold that was  not equipped with a ladder for access and egress.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $500
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.   a) 115 Rosewood Dr., Metairie, LA; On or about 08/13/13, the employer did not ensure adequate fall protection was provided to employees working over 10 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $500
  • · Z (S) $2000

View Baker Stucco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339300642.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.