BATON ROUGE, LA ·
OSHA Inspection: NEEDY-GREATER BATON ROUGE INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEEDY-GREATER BATON ROUGE INC in 2746 BERLIN DR, BATON ROUGE, LA 70814 (NAICS 452910). OSHA activity number 339316655.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NEEDY-GREATER BATON ROUGE INC
- Site address
- 2746 BERLIN DR
- City
- BATON ROUGE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70814
- Mailing
- 2746 BERLIN DR, BATON ROUGE, LA 70814
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 452910
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,530 · Current $918 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse: On or about 08/19/2013, the employer did not ensure that bales of textile materials were stacked or blocked in some manner to prevent tipping. The bales were stacked in 2 rows, 5 bales high, 35 bales per row, where the outer row, if struck by a powered industrial truck from behind, could topple over onto employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $918
- · Z (S) $1530
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,530 · Current $918 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: On or about 08/19/2013, the employer permitted employees to operate the Catepillar fork lift without successfully completing the rtequired training. This exposed other employees in the area to the hazard of being struck by the lift when in operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $918
- · Z (S) $1530
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,530 · Current $918 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by moving parts. On or about 08/19/2013, the employer did not ensure that all guards were installed on the General Hydraulics Bailing Machine located in the main warehouse. The rear door of the Bailer had broken off and the sensor was tied in place to allow for the operation of the Bailer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $918
- · Z (S) $1530
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $918 · Current $551 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about 08/19/2013, the employer did not develop implement or maintain a a written hazard communication program at the worksite. The employer uses chemicals, such as but not limited to, gasoline, diesel fuel, hydraulic fluid, cleaning chemicals, etc.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $550.8
- · Z (S) $918
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: On or about 08/19/2013, the employer did not that copies of MSDS for all hazardous chemicals were maintained at the jobsite. The employer uses such chemicals as, but is not limited to, gasoline, diesel, hydraulic fluid, cleaning compounds. etc., exposing employees to being unaware of the hazards associated with the various chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 452910)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339316655.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.