WATERTOWN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: STEVEN SANTOS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STEVEN SANTOS in 133 DALTON STREET, WATERTOWN, CT 06779 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339317042.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEVEN SANTOS
- Site address
- 133 DALTON STREET
- City
- WATERTOWN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06779
- Mailing
- 315 STONEFENCE RD., NAUGATUCK, CT 06770
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: 133 Dalton Street, Watertown, CT 06779. On or about 08/16/2013 an employee was exposed to an electrical hazard while utilizing an extension cord with missing sections of the outer sheathing exposing the inside conductors sheathing to physical damage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) 133 Dalton Street, Watertown, CT 06779. On or about 08/16/2013: The employees were exposed to the fall hazard while engaged in roofing activities without utilizing any type of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: 422 Pike Place, Windsor, CT 06095 on or about 05/14/2013: The employees were utilizing a ladder and the side rails did not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface exposing the employee to the fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339317042.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.