Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIDSTATE MANUFACTURING CO.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MIDSTATE MANUFACTURING CO. in 750 W 3RD ST., GALESBURG, IL 61401 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339323651.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Midstate Manufacturing CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Midstate Manufacturing CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
750 W 3RD ST.
City
GALESBURG
State
IL
ZIP
61401
Mailing
750 W 3RD ST., GALESBURG, IL 61401
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
256
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 E09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Nov 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $2,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 044010802590V109

29 CFR 1910.107(e)(9): Whenever flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 °F (93 °C) are transferred from one container to another, both containers were not effectively bonded and grounded to prevent discharge sparks of static electricity.    Employees engaged in painting operations were required to transfer and mix flammable paint products such as, but not limited to, Yellow Enamel L/F (Class 1B), Yellow Primer R/I L/F (Class 1B) and Lacquer Thinner (Class 1B) while in the paint booth and the employer had implemented any bonding and grounding measures to prevent static discharge.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $4400

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Hazardous substances 044010802590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Employees engaged in painting operations were required to wear half-mast elastomeric respirators while in the paint booth and the employer had not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1650
  • — Z (S) $3300

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 044010802590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Employees engaged in painting operations were required to wear half-mast elastomeric respirators while in the paint booth and the employer had not provided medical evaluations as part of a respiratory protection program prior to the use of respiratory protection in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 044010802590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  Employees engaged in painting operations were required to wear half-mast elastomeric respirators while in the paint booth and the employer had not provided fit-tested as part of a respiratory protection program prior to the use of respiratory protection in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 044010802590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  Employees engaged in painting operations were required to wear half-mast elastomeric respirators while in the paint booth and the employer had not provided training as part of a respiratory protection program prior to the use of respiratory protection in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,650 Reduced

Hazardous substances 044010802590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    Employees engaged in painting operations were required to wear half-mast elastomeric respirators while in the paint booth and the employer had not identified and evaluated the respiratory hazards and the employee exposures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1650
  • — Z (S) $3300

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2013
Abate by
Nov 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 044010802590V109

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:    Employees engaged in painting operations were required to wear half-mast elastomeric respirators while in the paint booth and the employer had not identified and evaluated the respiratory hazards and then developed and implemented a change schedule for combination cartridges in use by the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Midstate Manufacturing CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339323651.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.