Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: COLUMBIA MAXILLOFACIAL IMAGING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of COLUMBIA MAXILLOFACIAL IMAGING, LLC in 2049 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY, SUITE 306, ROCKY HILL, CT 06067 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 339362642.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Columbia Maxillofacial Imaging, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Columbia Maxillofacial Imaging, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2049 SILAS DEANE HIGHWAY, SUITE 306
City
ROCKY HILL
State
CT
ZIP
06067
Mailing
483 WEST MIDDLE TURNPIKE, SUITE 309, MANCHESTER, CT 06040
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621210
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:    ORAL SURGERY STORAGE ROOM:  On or about August 29, 2013, three "E" size cylinders of compressed gas (two oxygen, one nitrous oxide) were stored behind a door without being secured to prevent the cylinders from falling.  (Ref. CGA-P-1-1965 Section 3.3.1 referencing CGA P-1 Scetion 5.7.4)
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:    STERILIZATION AND BREAK ROOMS:  On or about August 29, 2013, a portable fire extinguisher mounted on the wall in was observed to have an inspection tag indicating that the last inspection had been conducted in May 2012.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.1030 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii): The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain at least the elements in 29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(A) through (c)(1)(ii)(C):    On or about August 29, 2013, the employer had developed an Exposure Control Plan that was deficient in the following areas: there was no procedure for handling used PPE, no location was listed for administration of HBV vaccinations, and there was no information describing where employee medical records would be stored.    Employees perform dental procedures ranging from prophylactic cleaning to periodontics, orthodontics, and oral surgery on a daily basis.  During these procedures they are exposed to patients' blood.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3120
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure:      STERILIZATION ROOM:  On or about August 29, 2013, the employer had not implemented engineering or work practice controls to eliminate or minimnize exposure of employees to contaminated reusable sharps.  Such equipment must be scrubbed to remove gross contamination prior to ultrasonic treatment.    Employees perform dental procedures ranging from prophylactic cleaning to periodontics, orthodontics, and oral surgery.  The reusable sharps are contaminated with patients' blood.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3120
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 F02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in Appendix A:    COMPANY-WIDE:  On or about August 29, 2013 the employer presented forms completed by some employees indicating that they had received the vaccination series.  The statement from Appendix A was not included on the form.    Employees perform dental procedures ranging from prophylactic cleaning to periodontics, orthodontics, and oral surgery on a daily basis.  During these procedures they are exposed to patients' blood.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3120
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1030 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program:    COMPANY-WIDE:    On or about August 29, 2013, the employer had not provided employees with training related to the Exposure Control Plan and blood-borne pathogens.    Employees perform dental procedures ranging from prophylactic cleaning to periodontics, orthodontics, and oral surgery on a daily basis.  During these procedures they are exposed to patients' blood.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3120
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1096 D01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $3,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions:    FACILITY-WIDE:  On or about August 29 and September 3, 2013, the employer had not conducted an evaluation of the radiation hazards related to the GENDEX Expert DC x-ray machines present throughout the office or the Imaging Sciences I-Cat Cone Beam 3-D Dental Imaging System.  The GENDEX Expert DC x-ray machines are installed in each operatory/examining room.    Dental hygienists and assistants take x-rays of patients as necessary during routine treatments.  Employees who work in the operatories/examination rooms are exposed daily to any scatter radiation or radiation leaks in the rooms from the GENDEX Expert DC x-ray machines.  In addition, the receptionist is potentially exposed due to the location of her desk in relation to the I-Cat Cone Beam 3-D Dental Imaging System.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3120
  • · Z (S) $4500

1910.1096 I02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1096(i)(2): All individuals working in or frequenting any portion of radiation areas were not instructed in the safety problems associated with exposure to radioactive materials or radiation and in precautions or devices to minimize exposure:  FACILITY-WIDE: On or about August 29, 2013, the employer had not instructed the employees who use or work in the area of the x-ray machines and the I-Cat Cone Beam 3-D Dental Imaging System of safety problems associated with exposure to ionizing radiation and in precautions or devices to minimize exposure.  Dental hygienists and assistants take x-rays of patients as necessary during routine treatments.  Employees who work in the operatories/examination rooms are exposed daily to any scatter radiation or radiation leaks in the rooms from the GENDEX Expert DC x-ray machines.  In addition, the receptionist is potentially exposed due to the location of her desk in relation to the I-Cat Cone Beam 3-D Dental Imaging System.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1096 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1096(i)(3): The employer did not post a current copy of 29 CFR 1910.1096, and a copy of the operating procedures applicable to the work conspicuously in such location(s), to ensure that employees working in or frequenting radiation areas would observe these documents on the way to or from their place of employment:  FACILITY-WIDE: On or about August 29, 2013, the employer did not have a current copy of 29 CFR 1910.1096 or site-specific operating procedures for the GENDEX Expert DC x-ray machines available for employees to review.  Dental hygienists and assistants take x-rays of patients as necessary during routine treatments.  Employees who work in the operatories/examination rooms are exposed daily to any scatter radiation or radiation leaks in the rooms from the GENDEX Expert DC x-ray machines.  In addition, the receptionist is potentially exposed due to the location of her desk in relation to the I-Cat Cone Beam 3-D Dental Imaging System.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,700 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    OPERATORIES, STERILIZATION ROOMS, LAB:    On or about August 29, 2013, the employer had not developed a hazard communication program addressing hazardous chemicals used in the facility.  Employees use chemicals to clean and disinfect operatories and equipment on a daily basis.  Chemical products used in the office include, but are not limited to: isopropyl alcohol, o-phenylphenol, o-benzyl-p-chlorophenol, phosphoric acid, p-tertiary amylphenol, and dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1900
  • · Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2013
Abate by
Jan 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  OPERATORIES, STERILIZATION ROOMS, LAB:  On or about August 29, 2013, the employer had not provided employees with information and training addressing hazardous chemicals used in the facility.  Employees use chemicals to clean and disinfect operatories and equipment on a daily basis.  Chemical products used in the office include, but are not limited to: isopropyl alcohol, o-phenylphenol, o-benzyl-p-chlorophenol, phosphoric acid, p-tertiary amylphenol, and dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339362642.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.