OSHA Inspection: TAYLORMADE RESTORATION, LLC

Issued

Sep 25, 2013

Abate by

Nov 13, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,520 · Current $2,520

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):   Workers were engaged in residential construction activities re-roofing an existing single family house. Workers exposed to potential 24.0 foot fall hazards in that an inspection of the jobsite by a competent person was not conducted.

Issued

Sep 25, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,520 · Current $2,520

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Workers were observed engaged in residential construction activities re-roofing an existing single family house. Workers were exposed to potential 24.0 foot fall hazards in that a proper fall protection system was not utilized.

Issued

Sep 25, 2013

Abate by

Nov 13, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,520 · Current $2,520

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Workers were engaged in residential construction activities re-roofing an existing single family house. Workers exposed to potential 24.0 foot fall hazards in that the workers were not properly trained in fall protection criteria.