Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: SABER ROUSTABOUT SERVICE, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SABER ROUSTABOUT SERVICE, LLC in VIRGIL #1-30H, SEC 30-15N-11W, BLAINE COUNTY, GREENFIELD, OK 73043 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 339369845.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Saber Roustabout Service, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Saber Roustabout Service, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
VIRGIL #1-30H, SEC 30-15N-11W, BLAINE COUNTY
City
GREENFIELD
State
OK
ZIP
73043
Mailing
PO BOX 196, RINGWOOD, OK 73768
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.181 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.181(c)(1): Permanently installed derrick(s) with fixed lengths of boom, guy, and mast were not provided with substantial, durable, and clearly legible rating chart(s) securely affixed where visible to personnel responsible for the safe operation of the equipment:   Well site:  On or about August 27, 2013, and times prior to, employees providing roustabout services during the upgrading of an oil/gas well used a truck mounted gin pole (breast type) derrick to remove the well  Christmas Tree.  There was no derrick load rating information available to the operator.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of being struck by a falling load and/or derrick components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $816
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.181 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.181(d)(2):  Frequent inspections of derricks were not conducted on items such identified in 1910.181(d)(2)(i) to (ix) for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph 1910.181(d)(1)(ii)(a) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections:  Well site:  On or about August 27, 2013, and times prior to, employees providing roustabout services during the upgrading of an oil/gas well used a truck mounted gin pole (breast type) derrick to remove the well  Christmas Tree.  There were no derrick inspections.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of being struck by a falling load and/or derrick components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.181 D03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.181(d)(3)(i): Complete inspections of the derrick were not performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph 1910.181(d)(1)(ii)(b) of this section depending upon its activity, severity of service, and environment, or as specifically indicated:  Well site:  On or about August 27, 2013, and times prior to, employees providing roustabout services during the upgrading of an oil/gas well used a truck mounted gin pole (breast type) derrick to remove the well  Christmas Tree.  There were no derrick inspections.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of being struck by a falling load and/or derrick components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.181 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2013
Abate by
Feb 5, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.181(g)(1): The employer did not ensure that thorough inspection of running ropes in use was made at least once a month nor that a certification record which included the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection, and an identifier for the ropes which were inspected was prepared and kept on file where readily available:    Well site:  On or about August 27, 2013, and times prior to, employees providing roustabout services during the upgrading of an oil/gas well used a truck mounted gin pole (breast type) derrick to remove the well  Christmas Tree.  There were no derrick running rope inspections or certifications maintained.  This exposed the employees to the hazard of being struck by a falling load and/or derrick components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.184 C14

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $816 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(14): 29 CFR 1910.184(c)(14):  Employers used slings without affixed and legible identification markings:   Well site:  On or about August 27, 2013, and times prior to, employees providing roustabout services during the upgrade of an oil/gas well, used a chain sling lacking an identification tag to remove the well's christmas tree.  This exposed them to the hazard of being struck by a falling load.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $816
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:  Well site:  On or about August 27, 2013, and times prior to, employees providing roustabout services during the upgrade of an oil/gas well, used a chain sling lacking an identification tag to remove the well's christmas tree.  This exposed them to the hazard of being struck by a falling load.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.184 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2013
Abate by
Dec 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(i): Thorough periodic inspections of alloy steel chain slings in use were not made on a regular basis:   Well site:  On or about August 27, 2013, and times prior to, employees providing roustabout services during the upgrade of an oil/gas well, used a chain sling to remove the well's christmas tree.  The sling did not receive periodic inspections.  This exposed them to the hazard of being struck by a falling load.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339369845.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.