Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: TIGHITCO, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of TIGHITCO, INC. in 1375 SEABOARD INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, ATLANTA, GA 30318 (NAICS 336413). OSHA activity number 339382293.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tighitco, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tighitco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TIGHITCO, INC.
Site address
1375 SEABOARD INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
City
ATLANTA
State
GA
ZIP
30318
Mailing
1375 SEABOARD INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, ATLANTA, GA 30318
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336413
Employees
175
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 004024602590

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible material:     a) Spray Paint Room: The employer failed to ensure that the storage of painting supplies, chemicals and other materials were not situated next to the spray painting room. Employees were exposed to the hazards of a fire and/or explosion while utilizing materials, such as  but limited to, toluene, xylene and other highly flammable materials while spray painting thermal metal components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $5000

1910.124 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $6,000

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.124(g)(2): Employees who  worked with liquids that could burn, irritate, or otherwise harm their skin were not provided with an emergency shower and eye-wash station close to the dipping and coating operation:   a) Degreaser Area: The employer failed to ensure that an eyewash/shower facility was maintained in the proximity of the degreaser operation. Employees were exposed to skin and eye contact with 1-Bromopropane while performing assigned duties involving the degreasing of metal thermal components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $6,000

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.    a) Degreaser Area: The employer failed to ensure that adequate protective equipment was provided and/or utilized by degreaser operators while performing dipping operations, cleaning, waste removal, adding solvent to the degreaser tank and other duties involving the use of 1-Bromopropane. An employee was utilizing a cotton denim apron that was not impervious to the solvent being utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.132 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2590R290

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:   a) Tighitco: The employer failed to maintain and certify in writing a personal protective equipment hazard assessment had been conducted for employees performing maintenance, degreaser and spray painting operations. Employees were exposed to the hazards of 1-Bromopropane, toluene, acetone, xylene and other materials that required the use of eye, face, hand, and other personal protective equipment. No specific identification of the required personal protective equipment was identified for the work assignment employees were engaged in.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 10, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes  a)Degreaser Area: The employer failed to ensure that adequate hand protection was provided and/or utilized by degreaser operators while performing dipping operations, cleaning, waste removal, adding solvent to the degreaser tank and other duties involving the use of 1-Bromopropane. An employee was utilizing a cotton/flex, wrist lengh glove while performing degreaser operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $6,000

Hazardous substances 2460R290

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace     a) Spray Paint Room and Degreaser Area: The employer failed to provide a medical evaluation for all employees required to utilize a Comfo Classic MSA 4909 half mask respirator and/or a 3M N-95 to determine the employees ability to utilize a respirator. Employees were exposed to materials such as, but not limited to, 1-Bromopropane, toluene, xylene and other materials while performing spray paint, degreaser operations and other assigned duties involving the manufacture of thermal metal components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2460R290

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):      a) Spray Paint Area and Degreaser Area: The employer failed to provide an annual fit test for all employees required to utilize a Comfo Classic MSA 4909 half mask respirator and/or a 3M N-95. Employees were exposed to materials such as, but not limited to, 1-Bromopropane, toluene, xylene and other materials while performing spray paint, degreaser operations and other assigned duties involving the manufacture of thermal metal components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $6,000

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function     a) Degreaser Area: The employer failed to ensure that all employees required to utilize a Comfo Classic MSA 4909 half mask respirator did not have facial hair . Employees were exposed to materials such as, but not limited to, 1-Bromopropane while performing degreaser operations and other assigned duties involving the manufacture of thermal metal components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6000
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $6,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee can demonstrate knowledge of items in (i)-(vii)     a) Spray Paint Area and Degreaser Area: The employer failed to provide and ensure that all employees required to utilize a Comfo Classic MSA 4909 half mask respirator and/or a 3M N-95 were provided training on the care, usage, storage and other aspects of the respirators. Employees were exposed to materials such as, but not limited to, 1-Bromopropane, toluene, xylene and other materials while performing spray paint, degreaser operations and other assigned duties involving the manufacture of thermal metal components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $6000

1910.146 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0560R290

29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:   a) Production Area: The employer failed to evaluate the workplace and determine if permit required confined spaces were present. Contracted workers were exposed to 1-bromopropane, carbon monoxide, oxygen deficient atmospheres, inhalation and other hazards while performing entry into a degreaser tank to perform duties involving tank clean-out to remove dirt, grease and other contaminates in the degreaser tank and the replacement of heating elements.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.107 B05 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2014
Abate by
Mar 3, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 004024602590

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The spraying operations (except electrostatic spraying operations) were not designed, installed and maintained such that the average air velocity over the open face of the booth (or booth cross section during spraying operations) was not less than 100 linear feet per minute:   a) Spray Paint Room: The employer failed to ensure that the air velocity over the surface of the spray room was at least 100 lfpm. Employees were exposed to the hazards of a fire and/or explosion while utilizing materials, such as  but limited to, toluene, xylene and other highly flammable materials while spray painting thermal metal components.  Velometer readings indicated that the lower quadrant of the spray room ranged from 15 to 50 lfpm.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Tighitco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339382293.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.