Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNITED AVIONICS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UNITED AVIONICS in 38 GREAT HILL ROAD, NAUGATUCK, CT 06770 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 339391526.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch United Avionics — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for United Avionics is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
UNITED AVIONICS
Site address
38 GREAT HILL ROAD
City
NAUGATUCK
State
CT
ZIP
06770
Mailing
38 GREAT HILL ROAD, NAUGATUCK, CT 06770
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336412
Employees
54
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.  WORKSHOP:      1.  The rotating chuck of the Logan lathe was unguarded.  2.  The ingoing nip points, created by the pulleys and belt of the Dayton vertical belt sander were unguarded.    3.  The ingoing nip points, created by the pulleys and belts of the Baldor-Reliance vertical belt sander were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.  WORKSHOP:  The point-of-operation of the #1 through #6 molding presses, unknown identification were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2013
Abate by
Dec 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)  WORKSHOP:  The right peripheral member of the Triple duty pedestal grinder was missing a tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1470
  • — Z (S) $2100

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 6 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Oct 23, 2013
Abate by
Nov 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $490 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1):  You must enter information about your business at the top of the OSHA 300 Log, enter a one or two line description for each recordable injury or illness, and summarize this information on the OSHA 300-A at the end of the year.  ESTABLISHMENT:  The OSHA 300 log of work-related injuries and illnesses for the 2013 year was not completed in detail as followed:     1.      Case # 1, marked as an injury in column (M))(1), column (F) not marked with object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill. 2.      Case #1, marked as an injury in column (M)(1), was not marked in column (H); days away from work, column (I); job transfer or restriction, or column (J); other recordable cases. 3.      Case #2, marked as an injury in column (M))(1), column (F) was not marked with the object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill. 4.      Case #2, marked as an injury in column (M)(1), was not marked in column (H); days away from work, column (I); job transfer or restriction, or column (J); other recordable cases. 5.      Case #3 , marked as a respiratory condition in column (M)(3), column (F) was not marked with the object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill. 6.      Case #3, marked as a respiratory condition  in column (M)(3), was not marked in column (H); days away from work, column (I); job transfer or restriction, or column (J); other recordable cases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $490
  • — Z (O) $700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339391526.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.