NAUGATUCK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: UNITED AVIONICS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of UNITED AVIONICS in 38 GREAT HILL ROAD, NAUGATUCK, CT 06770 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 339391526.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNITED AVIONICS
- Site address
- 38 GREAT HILL ROAD
- City
- NAUGATUCK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06770
- Mailing
- 38 GREAT HILL ROAD, NAUGATUCK, CT 06770
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336412
- Employees
- 54
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc. WORKSHOP: 1. The rotating chuck of the Logan lathe was unguarded. 2. The ingoing nip points, created by the pulleys and belt of the Dayton vertical belt sander were unguarded. 3. The ingoing nip points, created by the pulleys and belts of the Baldor-Reliance vertical belt sander were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle. WORKSHOP: The point-of-operation of the #1 through #6 molding presses, unknown identification were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2450
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.) WORKSHOP: The right peripheral member of the Triple duty pedestal grinder was missing a tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1470
- — Z (S) $2100
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $490 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): You must enter information about your business at the top of the OSHA 300 Log, enter a one or two line description for each recordable injury or illness, and summarize this information on the OSHA 300-A at the end of the year. ESTABLISHMENT: The OSHA 300 log of work-related injuries and illnesses for the 2013 year was not completed in detail as followed: 1. Case # 1, marked as an injury in column (M))(1), column (F) not marked with object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill. 2. Case #1, marked as an injury in column (M)(1), was not marked in column (H); days away from work, column (I); job transfer or restriction, or column (J); other recordable cases. 3. Case #2, marked as an injury in column (M))(1), column (F) was not marked with the object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill. 4. Case #2, marked as an injury in column (M)(1), was not marked in column (H); days away from work, column (I); job transfer or restriction, or column (J); other recordable cases. 5. Case #3 , marked as a respiratory condition in column (M)(3), column (F) was not marked with the object/substance that directly injured or made the person ill. 6. Case #3, marked as a respiratory condition in column (M)(3), was not marked in column (H); days away from work, column (I); job transfer or restriction, or column (J); other recordable cases.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $490
- — Z (O) $700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336412)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339391526.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.