Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ORNAMENTAL METALWORKS INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ORNAMENTAL METALWORKS INC. in 2100 N. WOODFORD, SUITE 100, DECATUR, IL 62526 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 339392789.

Watch Ornamental Metalworks INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ornamental Metalworks INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2100 N. WOODFORD, SUITE 100
City
DECATUR
State
IL
ZIP
62526
Mailing
P.O. BOX 977, DECATUR, IL 62526
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employeees are exposed to struck-by hazards from pre-cast ceiling panels that are deteriorated to the point that they may be subject to structural collapse.    Employees working in the machine shop were exposed to struck-by hazards while performing work activities beneath deteriorating pre-cast ceiling panels and the employer has not ensured that the structure is maintained in a safe condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.    Employees are exposed to illnesses from the accumulation of bird droppings on the floor and equipment in the shop and the employer has not taken the necessary steps to remove the droppings.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.141 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(5): Enclosed workplaces were not so constructed, equipped, and maintained as to prevent the entrance or harborage of rodents, insects, or other vermin:    Employees are exposed to illnesses associated with the accumulation of bird droppings and the employer has not taken to necessary steps to prevent the entrance or harborage of the birds.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations:    a.  Employees were exposed to fire hazards as the Air Compressor located within the spray area was not designed for Class I, Division 1 Hazardous Locations    b.  Employees were exposed to fire hazards as the electric hoist located in the spray area was not designed for Class I, Division 1 Hazardous Locations
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:     An employee wore a tight-fitting, half-face respirator when applying a spray finish, and the employer did not ensure that the employee did not have facial hair that would interfere with the sealing of the respirator to the employee's face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.134 K01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator:  An employee was exposed to chemical inhalation hazard while wearing a tight-fitting half-face respirator with facial hair because the employer had not ensured that he was trained regarding the factors that would affect the seal of hte respirator to his face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point of operation guards were not designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of their body in the danger zone during the operating cycle:    Employees were exposed to amputation hazards because the point of operation on the shear was not properly guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 H02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and material safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:    Employees were not provided with training on the location and availability of the written hazards communication program, including the location of the material safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards and the employer did not provide training on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals the employees were using.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View ORNAMENTAL METALWORKS INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339392789.