OSHA Inspection: PATRICK G. MCDONNELL

Issued

2014-01-16 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-01-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):   807 Smithfield Road - On or about August 5, 2013 - The employer did not determine the employee exposure prior to the start of window replacement work under the EPA's lead based paint Renovation Repair and Painting requirements.

Issued

2014-01-16 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-01-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v): 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Prior to the performance of an employee exposure assessment as required by (d) of this section, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in paragraphs (d)(2)(i)-(iv) of this section interim protection, including, but not limited to appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section, appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section, appropriate change areas in accordance with paragraph (i)(2) of this section, Hand washing facilities in accordance with paragraph (i)(5) of this section:   807 Smithfield Road - On or About August 05, 2013 - The employer did not provide personal protective equipment to employees replacing windows under the EPA's lead based paint Renovation Repair and Painting requirements.

Issued

2014-01-16 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-01-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(e)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to achieve compliance with 29 CFR 1926.62(c) prior to commencement of the job:   807 Smithfield Rd - The employer did not develop or implement a written compliance program before replacing the seventeen windows under the EPA's lead based paint Renovation Repair and Painting requirements.

Issued

2014-01-16 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-01-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:   807 Smithfield Rd - The surfaces below the seventeen windows that were replaced were not kept free of accumulations of lead containing paint during the EPA regulated Renovation Replacement and Painting regulated project

Issued

2014-01-16 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-01-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(h)(4): Where vacuuming methods were selected, the vacuums were not equipped with HEPA filters and/or were not used and emptied in a manner which minimized the reentry of lead into the workplace:   807 Smithfield Rd - The Ridgid 12-Gallon shop vacuum was not equipped with a HEPA filter.

Issued

2014-01-16 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-01-27 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $2400.00

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5)(i): The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.51(f), for use by employees exposed to lead:  807 Smithfield Rd - The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities for employees exposed to lead.