PROSPECT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: S&S CARPENTRY OF CT, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of S&S CARPENTRY OF CT, LLC in 12-14-16 LILAC LANE, PROSPECT, CT 06712 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339402109.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- S&S CARPENTRY OF CT, LLC
- Site address
- 12-14-16 LILAC LANE
- City
- PROSPECT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06712
- Mailing
- 13 CROWN ST. APT. # 3, DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l). Worksite: The employee who was operating the Lull material handler was not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Worksite: The employees who were installing plywood sheathing with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.403 B02
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification. Worksite: The knockout type junction box equipped with duplex receptacles and attached to a flexible cord to power electrical equipment was exposed to physical damage and not used in accordance with the listing and labeling specifications.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employees who were sheathing the 8 in 12 pitch roof above six feet were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards above six feet while sheathing a roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339402109.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.