LINDEN, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: LINDEN MILLING CO., INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LINDEN MILLING CO., INC. in 107 CHURCH ST., LINDEN, WI 53553 (NAICS 311119). OSHA activity number 339402489.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LINDEN MILLING CO., INC.
- Site address
- 107 CHURCH ST.
- City
- LINDEN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53553
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 529, LINDEN, WI 53553
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311119
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.272 K
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(k): Receiving pit feed openings, such as truck or railcar receiving pits, were not covered by grates which had a maximum opening width of 2 1/2 inches (6.35 cm): On or about September 9, 2013, the receiving pit for eared corn was covered by a grate with a maximum opening of greater than 2 1/2 inches (6.35 cm).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1440
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
05602150
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met: On or about September 9, 2013, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program. The list of hazardous chemicals present at the worksite includes, but is not limited to, liquid propane, carbon monoxide, and mineral based lubricants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employers did not have a material safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: On or about September 9, 2013, the employer did not have material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical. The list of hazardous chemicals present at the worksite includes, but is not limited to, liquid propane, carbon monoxide, and mineral based lubricants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area: On or about September 9, 2013, the employer had not provided training for employee(s) on hazardous chemicals. The list of hazardous chemicals present at the worksite includes, but is not limited to, liquid propane, carbon monoxide, and mineral based lubricants.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about September 9, 2013, the employer had not ensured that each operator of the Komatsu LP forklift (Serial No. 137838) had been trained and evaluated to safely operate this forklift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Nov 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer had not certified that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): On or about September 9, 2013, the employer had not certified that each operator had been trained and evaluated to operate the Komatsu LP forklift (Serial No. 137838).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311119)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339402489.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.