Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONCRETE RESTORATION SPECIALISTS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CONCRETE RESTORATION SPECIALISTS in W. STATE ST. BRIDGE, FREMONT, OH 43420 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 339408858.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Concrete Restoration Specialists — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Concrete Restoration Specialists is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
W. STATE ST. BRIDGE
City
FREMONT
State
OH
ZIP
43420
Mailing
P.O. BOX 283, SHARON CENTER, OH 44274
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,155 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer did not ensure employees working from suspended scaffolding were protected from head injuries while working below employees working from the bridge deck above. Employees below were exposed to potential impact injuries caused from falling material and/or equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1155
  • — Z (S) $2100

1926.106 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.106(a): Employee(s) working over or near water where the danger of drowning existed, were not provided with U.S. Coast Guard approved life jacket(s) or buoyant work vest(s):    (a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure approved buoyant life vests were available onsite for employees working over water.  In the event of a fall into the water without the stated equipment, personnel working over water exceeding 3 ft. in depth would be exposed to an increased probability of drowning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.106 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.106(c): Ring buoys with at least 90 feet of line were not provided and readily available for emergency rescue operations:    (a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure a water buoyant life ring was available at the work site to aid in potential rescue operations. In the event employee recovery is necessary without the stated equipment, personnel working over water exceeding 3 ft. in depth would be exposed to an increased probability of drowning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.106 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.106(d): A lifesaving skiff was not immediately available at locations where employees were working over or adjacent to water:    (a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure a lifesaving skiff was available at the work site to aid in potential rescue operations. In the event employee recovery is necessary without the stated equipment, personnel working over water exceeding 3 ft. in depth would be exposed to an increased probability of drowning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed and loaded in accordance with the design by a qualified person:    a) Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure an adequate amount counterweight was applied to the manufacture engineered suspended scaffolding system (Spider ST-17 hoist supported by a Spider 8-0217-6 outrigger beam) as listed in the manufactures load chart. Employees working from the suspended scaffolding system in this condition were exposed to overturning and ultimately fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 D03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(3)(iv): Counterweights were not secured by mechanical means to the outrigger beams to prevent accidental displacement:    a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure the free weight plates used as counterweights on the Spider Suspended Scaffold Outrigger Beam system were adequately secured against accidental displacement. Employees working from the scaffold in this condition were exposed to overturning and ultimately fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 D05 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,925 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(5)(iii): Suspension scaffold support devices such as cornice hooks, roof hooks, roof irons, parapet clamps, or similar devices were not secured against movement by tiebacks installed at right angles to the face of the building or structure:    a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure the cornice hooks used to support the suspended scaffold systems were adequately secured against accidental displacement with tiebacks. Employees working from the scaffold in this condition were exposed to system failure and ultimately fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1925
  • — Z (S) $3500

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.     a) Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure a safe means of access/egress was provided to employees working from a suspended scaffold system. During bridge restoration work, employees utilizing the suspended scaffold were climbing atop of the scaffolding rail, then using the bridge railing to pull themselves up and over onto the bridge deck. Employees accessing/egressing to and from the scaffold in this condition were exposed to falls of approximately 20 ft. to the river below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.451 G01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system:    a) Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure employees were adequately protected from a fall while working from a suspended scaffolding system. Employees performing concrete restoration activities without personal fall arrest systems were exposed to falls of 20 ft. to the river below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2695
  • — Z (S) $4900

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Jan 4, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    (a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer failed to ensure employees were protected from falls while position on the bridge piers outside the fixed guard rail system. Employees performing supportive activities outside the bridges guardrail system were exposed to falls of approximately 20 ft. to the water below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2013
Abate by
Nov 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $383 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.    a)  Concrete Restoration Specialists on or about September 10, 2013 at the W. State St. Bridge in Fremont, OH: The employer did not provide the representative of the Dept. of Labor, OSHA 300 logs for the year 2013 upon request in a timely manner.  Three requests were made on three different days to company representatives, requesting records kept under Part 1904.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $383
  • — Z (O) $700

View Concrete Restoration Specialists's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339408858.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.