TEANECK, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: J&J HANDYMAN HOME IMPROVEMENT
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J&J HANDYMAN HOME IMPROVEMENT in 200 GRIGGS AVENUE, TEANECK, NJ 07666 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339409716.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J&J HANDYMAN HOME IMPROVEMENT
- Site address
- 200 GRIGGS AVENUE
- City
- TEANECK
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07666
- Mailing
- 182 FRANKLIN AVENUE, RIDGEWOOD, NJ 07450
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: A) Roof of house : Employees were exposed to eye/face injuries while using nail guns and were not provided with any type of eye/face protection, on or about August 15th, 2013.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $800
- · C (S) $1600
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) A) Roof of house : Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 18 feet while engaged in roofing work on a residential structure without a means of fall protection in place, on or about August 15th, 2013.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1000
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: A) Front of house : Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 18 feet while using an extension ladder to access a roof. The extension ladder that was used did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing, on or about August 15th, 2013.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1000
- · C (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339409716.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.