CLEARWATER, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: BADARO GROUP CORP.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BADARO GROUP CORP. in 6140 ULMERTON ROAD, CLEARWATER, FL 33760 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 339409823.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BADARO GROUP CORP.
- Site address
- 6140 ULMERTON ROAD
- City
- CLEARWATER
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33760
- Mailing
- 6140 ULMERTON ROAD, CLEARWATER, FL 33760
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the employees were exposed to a struck by hazard while unloading granite stone bundles: a) On or about 9/9/13, an employee was permitted to work in the fall shadow of two bundles of granite slabs. The granite bundles were inside a cargo box and while the employee removed the wood supports that were in between the two bundles they fell and trapped the employee. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to train the employees to stay out of the "fall shadow" while removing the wood supports.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposes an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service and an employee was using it before repairs and tests necessary to render the equipment safe were made: a) On or about 9/9/13 - an employee was using two extension cords with a Sawzall to cut wood supports. The employee was exposed to electrical current, in that, one of the extension cords did not have a plug on the end of it. The female end of the plug was missing, therefore, the hot and neutral wires were connected to male end of the second extension cord. b) On or about 9/9/13 - an employee was using two extension cords with a Sawzall to cut wood supports. The insulation on one of the extension cords was damaged which caused the three wires to protrude out of the insulation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Dec 27, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: (a) on or about 9/9/13 - an employee was exposed to an electrical hazard, in that, an extension cord being used with a Sawzall had the ground prong missing. (b) on or about 9/9/13 - an employee was exposed to an electrical hazard, in that, an extension cord, used with a Sawzall had a missing female end and the hot and neutral wires were connected to the male end of another extension cord, however; the ground wire was not connected.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339409823.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.