Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: THE NASSAL COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE NASSAL COMPANY in 415 W KALEY STREET, ORLANDO, FL 32806 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339416422.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Nassal Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Nassal Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
THE NASSAL COMPANY
Site address
415 W KALEY STREET
City
ORLANDO
State
FL
ZIP
32806
Mailing
415 W KALEY STREET, ORLANDO, FL 32806
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
400
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $2,040 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a. FRP area - during spraying operations where corrosive chemicals such as, but not limited to Syrgis Norox MEKP-9 and Syrgis Norox MEKP-9H are used, there were no capabilities for immediate flushing of the eyes in the work area.  Violation observed on or about 11/13/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2040
  • · Z (S) $3400

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Jan 16, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,530 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    a. High bay and east shop areas - employee(s) were exposed to struck-by hazards, in that, compressed air used with air blow nozzles connected to an air compressor to clean was at 75 p.s.i.  Violation observed on or about 9/16/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1530
  • · Z (S) $2550

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  d. High bay and east shop areas - the employer did not provide respirator medical evaluations when 3M N95 8210 Particulate Respirators were required for finishing and grinding operations.  Violation observed on or about 9/16/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  b. High bay and east shop areas - the employer did not provide respirator fit tests when 3M 8210 N95 Particulate Respirators were required for finishing and grinding operations.  Violation observed on or about 9/16/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
9 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  a. Sculpting south wall - Amerex fire extinguisher was blocked by materials such as, but not limited to a metal cart and a light stand.  Violation observed on or about 9/16/13.  b. Sculpting east wall - Amerex fire extinguisher was blocked by materials such as, but not limited to a shop vacuum and buckets.  Violation observed on or about 9/16/13.        c. Molding west wall - Amerex fire extinguisher was blocked by materials such as, but not limited to buckets of compounds.  Violation observed on or about 9/16/13.   d. FRP west pole - Amerex fire extinguisher was not identifiable, in that, the pressure gauge was not readable and covered with materials.  Violation was observed on or about 9/16/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 6, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:  a. FRP west wall - box 10 240 volt breakers were not labeled to indicate the electrical purpose.  Violation observed on or about 11/13/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.303 G01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 28, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i): The dimension of the working space in the direction of access to live parts operating at 600 volts or less and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while alive was less than indicated in Table S1:  a. FRP west area - the distance in between the wooden plywood wall and the electrical panels did not have a minimum clear distance of 3'.  Violation observed on or about 11/13/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View The Nassal Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339416422.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.