OSHA Inspection: ARTURO CARMAGO MARTINEZ

Issued

Sep 24, 2013

Abate by

Oct 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about September 23, 2013, at 1535 Creek Bend, Lawrenceville, Georgia:  An employee performing framing work from the ground with men working above him was exposed to struck-by hazards from falling tools, lumber, and plywood, when he did not use head protection.

Issued

Sep 24, 2013

Abate by

Oct 9, 2013

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  On or about September 23, 2013, at 1535 Creek Bend, Lawrenceville, Georgia:  An employee performing framing work was exposed to struck-by hazards from nails, and wood chips when he used a nail gun without eye protection.

Issued

Sep 24, 2013

Abate by

Oct 16, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about September 23, 2013, at 1535 Creek Bend, Lawrenceville, Georgia:  a) One employee performing framing work from the unprotected edge of the top plate of the house was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 19.3-feet when he did not use fall protection.   b) Two employees performing framing work from the trusses and roof decking were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 19.3-feet and greater when they did not use fall protection.

Issued

Sep 24, 2013

Abate by

Oct 24, 2013

Penalty

Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about September 23, 2013, at 1535 Creek Bend, Lawrenceville, Georgia:  Three employees performing framing work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 19.3-feet and greater when the employer did not train the employees how to recognize and minimize fall hazards on the job.