Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RIDGETOP ROOFING & RENOVATING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RIDGETOP ROOFING & RENOVATING in 16 9TH ST., CLINTONVILLE, WI 54929 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339424053.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ridgetop Roofing & Renovating — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ridgetop Roofing & Renovating is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
16 9TH ST.
City
CLINTONVILLE
State
WI
ZIP
54929
Mailing
140 MCKINLEY AVE., CLINTONVILLE, WI 54929
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) On 9/23/13, an employee working on the roof of the house at 16 9th St. in Clintonville, WI, with an eaves height of greater than 18 feet was not protected from falling or utilizing fall protection equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2013
Abate by
Dec 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) On 9/23/13, an employee working on the roof of the house at 16 9th St. in Clintonville, WI, with an eaves height of greater than 18 feet was not trained on fall hazards and procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) On 9/23/13, an employee was accessing the roof of the house at 16 9th St. in Clintonville, Wisconsin by an extension ladder when the ladder did not extend 3 feet above the roof eaves.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2013
Abate by
Dec 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): 1926.1060(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards:  a) Employees using an extension ladder at the site to access the roof were not trained on the placement of ladders and safe work practices to avoid fall hazards when climbing and stepping to and from the work surface to the ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.404 B01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2013
Abate by
Dec 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:   a)  On 9/23/13, at the worksite at 16 9th St. in Clintonville, employees were utilizing extension cords to plug in a hand held electric circular saw and an electric compressor without GFCI protection and without an assured equipment grounding conductor inspection program to prevent electrical shock.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.405 G01 III C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2013
Abate by
Nov 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(iii)(C): Flexible cords and cables were run through doorways, windows, or similar openings:    a) On 9/23/13, flexible cords powering a hand held circular saw, and an air compressor being used at the site at 16 9th St. in Clintonville were run beneath the front door and into the house exposing them to damage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339424053.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.