COLORADO SPRINGS, CO —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS MOJIA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUIS MOJIA in 447 CAPRICE COURT, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80921 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339426025.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS MOJIA
- Site address
- 447 CAPRICE COURT
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80921
- Mailing
- 1914 E. 16TH ST., PUEBLO, CO 81001
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) On or about September 26, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from eye injuries in that the employees did not wear eye protection while using pneumatic nail guns. Abatement Note: Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) On or about September 24, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from fall hazards of greater than 10 feet while reroofing a house without fall protection. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) On or about September 24, 2013, the employer did not instruct employees about fall hazards and the systems and procedures to follow to mitigate the hazards while removing old roofing material installing new material on a house. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339426025.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.