PENNSAUKEN, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: NFI
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NFI in 3905 RIVER ROAD, PENNSAUKEN, NJ 08110 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 339433039.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch NFI — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NFI is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NFI
- Site address
- 3905 RIVER ROAD
- City
- PENNSAUKEN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08110
- Mailing
- 1515 BURNT MILL RD, CHERRY HILL, NJ 08003
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484121
- Employees
- 32
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: Paint/refurbishing area: The employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program for employees working in the paint/refurbishing area with the following exposures: a) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 147.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 92.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 398 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. b) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 126.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.6 dBA. The sampling was performed for 383 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. c) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 119.9 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 378 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. d) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 116.5 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 401 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: Paint/refurbishing area: The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program for employees working in the paint/refurbishing area with the following exposures: a) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 147.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 92.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 398 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. b) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 126.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.6 dBA. The sampling was performed for 383 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. c) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 119.9 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 378 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. d) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 116.5 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 401 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.95 I02 I
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors were worn by an employee who was required by 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1) to wear personal protective equipment: Paint/refurbishing area: The employer did not ensure that hearing protection was worn by an employee working in the paint/refurbishing area with the following exposure: a) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 147.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 92.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 398 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.95 I02 II A
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(2)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors was worn by any employee who was exposed to an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels or greater and has not yet had a baseline audiogram established pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii): Paint/refurbishing area: The employer did not ensure that hearing protection was worn by the following employees working in the paint/refurbishing area with the following exposures to noise that had not yet had a baseline audiogram: a) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 147.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 92.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 398 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. b) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 126.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.6 dBA. The sampling was performed for 383 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. c) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 119.9 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 378 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. d) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 116.5 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 401 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who was exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: Paint/refurbishing area: The employer did not develop and implement a noise training program for employees working in the paint/refurbishing area with the following exposures: a) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Permissible Exposure Limit). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 147.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 92.7 dBA. The sampling was performed for 398 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. b) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 126.1% of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.6 dBA. The sampling was performed for 383 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. c) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 119.9 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.3 dBA. The sampling was performed for 378 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. d) A pallet repair employee was exposed to continuous noise levels in excess of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (Action Level). The employee's dosimeter dBA level was 116.5 % of the permissible level (90 dBA) and was equivalent to approximately 91.1 dBA. The sampling was performed for 401 minutes during one shift on 11/19/13. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5000
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a) Paint/refurbishing area: 4x4 receptacles were used as extension cords at eight of twelve workstations to power equipment such as, but not limited to, extension cords, angle grinders and skill saws, on or about 11/19/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: a) Paint/refurbishing area: Extension cords were used at eight of twelve workstations to power equipment such as, but not limited to, angle grinders and skill saws, on or about 11/19/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at NFI
View NFI's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484121)
Jul 13, 2026
R D Shaffer Trucking · QUINCY, IL
Jul 13, 2026
161538 - MAX Freight INC. · NEWPORT, NC
Jul 7, 2026
Rfx2026xmg193x0063 - Hogan Dedicated Services LLC DBA Hogan Transports · YUMA, AZ
Jul 7, 2026
Roehl Transport, INC. · OAKLAND, CA
Jul 6, 2026
161495 - Father - Sons LLC · CHARLOTTE, NC
More inspections in NJ
Jul 17, 2026
East Orange Community Charter School · EAST ORANGE, NJ
Jul 17, 2026
East Orange Community Charter School · EAST ORANGE, NJ
Jul 17, 2026
East Orange Community Charter School · EAST ORANGE, NJ
Jul 17, 2026
John Caruso Builders LLC · MOUNTAIN LAKES, NJ
Jul 16, 2026
Borough of Pennington Department of Public Works · PENNINGTON, NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339433039.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.