Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: T. G. CUPP & SONS INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of T. G. CUPP & SONS INC. in 465 LODGE DRIVE, WHEELING, WV 26003 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339434060.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch T. G. Cupp & Sons INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for T. G. Cupp & Sons INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
465 LODGE DRIVE
City
WHEELING
State
WV
ZIP
26003
Mailing
55 NORTH 28TH STREET, WHEELING, WV 26003
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):     The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:   (a)  On or about October 18, 2013, at the worksite, a safety and health program had not been initiated and maintained which addressed the following basic elements:   1.  Management Commitment and Leadership         A.  Policy statement: goals established, issued, and communicated to employees.         B.  Program Reviewed Annually.         C.  Participation in safety meetings, inspections; agenda item in meetings.         D.  Adequate commitment of resources.         E.  Safety rules and procedures incorporated into site operations.         F.  Management observations of safety rules.        2.  Assignment of Responsibility            A.  Safety designee on site, knowledgeable, and accountable.        B.  Supervisors' (including foremen) safety and health responsibilities understood.        C.  Employees adherence to safety rules.        3.  Identification and Control of Hazards         A.  Periodic site inspection program involving supervisors.         B.  Preventive controls in place (PPE, Maintenance, Engineering Controls).                                                          C.  Action taken to address hazards.         D.  Safety Committee, where appropriate.         E.  Technical reference materials available.        4.  Training and Education          A.  Supervisors receive basic safety and health training.          B.  Specialized training taken when needed.          C.  Existence of an employee training program, which is ongoing and effective.        5.  Recordkeeping and Hazard Analysis           A.  Records maintained of employee illnesses/injuries, and posted.           B.  Supervisors perform incident investigations, determine causes and propose corrective action.           C.  Injuries, near misses, and illnesses are evaluated for trends, similar causes; corrective action   initiated.                                             6.  First Aid and Medical Assistance           A.  First aid supplies and medical services available.           B.  Employees informed of medical results.           C.  Emergency procedures and training, where necessary.        Abatement Certification Required for this Item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1440
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.50 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Jan 17, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.50(c): A person who has a valid certificate in first-aid training was not available at the worksite to render first-aid:     a. Human resource Building: The employer did not have any one on site certified in first aid and employees were performing various tasks during the roofing operation such as but not limited to erecting scaffolds, using pneumatic nail guns and working at heights as determined on 10-18-13.     Abatement Certification Required for this Item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:     a. Human Resource Building / Garage Area: The ground man was not wearing a hard hat while performing various tasks during the roofing operation such as but not limited to carrying shingles up the ladder to employees working above him, as determined on 10-18-13.     Abatement Certification Required for this Item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:     a. Human Resource Building / Roof Bracket Scaffold: An employee was operating a Super Roof Max pneumatic nail gun to install shingles.  The employee was not wearing approved safety glasses and exposed to flying particles, as observed on 10-18-13.       b. Human Resource Building / Ladder Jack Scaffold: An employee was operating the Bostitch pneumatic nail gun to install shingles.  The employee was not wearing approved safety glasses and exposed to flying particles, as observed on 10-18-13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:     a. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building: Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 13.5 feet to the ground while working from a 17 foot section of the ladder jack scaffold which was approximately 24 feet long, as observed on 10-18-13.     Abatement Certification Required for this Item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.     a. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building: Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 18 feet to the ground while working from the 8 inch wide by 32 feet long roof bracket scaffold attached to the 14 in 12 sloped gambrel roof, as observed on 10-18-13.     b. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building: Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 24 feet to the ground below while working from the 8 inch wide by 16 feet long roof bracket scaffold attached to the 14 in 12 sloped gambrel roof, as observed on 10-18-13.    Abatement Documentation Required for this Item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet:      a. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building:  Employees were using the 20 foot Werner aluminum extension ladder to gain access to the ladder jack scaffold.  The side rails of the ladder only extend above the landing 24 inches in lieu of extending at least 3 feet, as observed on 10-18-13.     b. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building: Employees used a 32 foot Werner extension ladder to gain access to the left side of the roof bracket scaffold.  The side rails of the ladder only extended above the landing approximately 12 inches in lieu of extending at least 3 feet, as observed on 10-18-13.      c. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building: Employees used a 32 foot Werner extension ladder to gain access to the right side of the roof bracket scaffold.  The side rails of the ladder only extended above the landing approximately 6 inches in lieu of extending at least 3 feet, as observed on 10-18-13.    Abatement Certification Required for this Item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B21

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 10, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder:     a. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building: An employee did not grasp the ladder with at least one hand when he progressed up the Werner aluminum extension ladder while carrying a roll of Titanium Synthetic Underlayment over his shoulder, as determined on 10-18-13.      b. Garage Area of the Human Resource Building: An employee did not grasp the ladder with at least one hand when he progressed up the Werner aluminum extension ladder while carrying a bundle of shingles over his shoulder, as determined on 10-18-13.     Abatement Certification Required for this Item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View T. G. Cupp & Sons INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339434060.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.