KANSAS CITY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: FRANK MARTINEZ ROOFING
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FRANK MARTINEZ ROOFING in 3141 WOODVIEW COURT, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339436289.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRANK MARTINEZ ROOFING
- Site address
- 3141 WOODVIEW COURT
- City
- KANSAS CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64105
- Mailing
- 3141 WOODVIEW COURT, KANSAS CITY, MO 64105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On or about October 23, 2013 at worksite 1529 SW Whistle Drive in Lees Summit, Missouri- Employee was using a pnematic nail gun to secure wood to the frame of an exterior wall without having any means of eye or face protective equipment. Abatement certification for this item is not required.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about October 23, 2013 at worksite 1529 SW Whistle Drive in Lees Summit, Missouri- Employees were performing roofing operations at an elevated height on a steep pitch roof without any means of fall protection by way of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Abatement certification for this item is not required.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about October 23, 2013 at worksite 1529 SW Whistle Drive in Lees Summit, Missouri- Employees were accessing a working surface on a steep pitch roof by way of a portable ladder whose side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed. Abatement certification for this item is not required
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339436289.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.