Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,288Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-24 Last loaded 2026-07-29

OSHA Inspection: ASIAN CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ASIAN CONSTRUCTION in 145 MAIN STREET, EAST GREENWICH, RI 02818 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339437014.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Asian Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Asian Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ASIAN CONSTRUCTION
Site address
145 MAIN STREET
City
EAST GREENWICH
State
RI
ZIP
02818
Mailing
94 CASTLE ROCK RD., WARWICK, RI 02886
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolding was not designed and constructed by a qualified person.  a. Jobsite: On or about 10/23/2013, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffolding was designed and constrcuted by a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity.  Jobsite: On or about 10/23/2013, the employer failed to have the scaffold and the components inspected by a compentent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(i): The end of the platform extended over its support more than 12 inches, and did not provide adequate protection or guardrails to block employees from accessing the cantilevered end of the platform.    a. Jobsite: On or about 10/23/2013, the employer allowed employees to work from a scaffold that was improperly assembled, exposing the employees to fall hazards at the ends of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width ratio of more than four to one (4:1) was not properly restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means.    Jobsite: On or about 10/23/2013, the employer allowed use of scaffolding that was not properly supported by guying, tying or bracing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): The employer did not provide an adequate means to access to the scaffold platform, which was more than 2 feet below a point of access.    a. Jobsite: On or about 10/23/2013, the scaffolding did not have a means of access, forcing the employees to climb out of the third story windown to access the platform of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2013
Abate by
Jan 24, 2014
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not ensure that each employee who performed work on a scaffold was trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.     a. Jobsite: On or about 10/23/2013, the employer failed to train the employees to recognize the hazards associated with working on an improperly assembled scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2013
Abate by
Dec 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were not used for the purpose for which they were designed.  a. Jobsite, On or about 10/23/2013, employees tied extension together and used them as guard rails on the scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339437014.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.